So this scrolled through my inbox just before the new year began.
|
|
Indiana Online shared a post: Are you an elite athlete or performer looking for a way to stay enrolled with your school while traveling? Indiana Online’s Academy full-time program… |
|
|
|
|
Never miss an update with the LinkedIn app
|
|
|
This email was intended for Michael Barbour (Professor of Instructional Design and Director of Faculty Development for the College of Education & Health Services, Touro University California) |
Learn why we included this. |
You are receiving LinkedIn notification emails. |
Help |
|
© 2022 LinkedIn Corporation, 1000 West Maude Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94085. LinkedIn and the LinkedIn logo are registered trademarks of LinkedIn. |
|
The full item looked like this..
I guess it just caught my attention because it perpetuates a long held understanding that researchers of full-time K-12 online learning programs have just known. While these cyber charter schools will point to the a perception that they serve lower ability, struggling, at-risk students whenever someone questions their performance or tries to regulate them, the data has consistency not supported that perception. The data have pointed to the reality that these schools often serve a higher proportion of students described by this ad – students that are motivated, driven, organized, and who often have a strong support system around them.
Clearly this isn’t the description of all cyber charter and full-time online learning students, but the data has consistently shown that this type of students is over represented – often to the amount of four to five times higher – in online learning than in the traditional brick-and-mortar environments. Yet even with a higher percentage of students who have characteristics that should make them stronger performers, and a lower proportion of students who truly are struggling and at-risk, students enrolled in these full-time online programs and cyber charters consistency perform worse than their brick-and-mortar counterparts.
Unfortunately we have a small cadre of researchers in the field that have made a career out of looking for data-driven excuses to explain this when the root cause is generally staring them strait in the face. The one thing that these programs generally have in common is that they are directly or indirectly run by for-profit corporations – so the instructional model is not based on good pedagogy or sound instructional design. It is based on how to minimize the cost of educating each student (or put another way, how to maximize the profits per widget – cause that’s what for-profit corporations do).