Virtual School Meanderings

April 9, 2021

Expanding possibilities for alumni engagement

As I say each week…  From the neo-liberal, educational privatizers masquerading as an academic body – so the term research here is used VERY loosely (as none of this actually represents methodologically sound, reliable, valid, or empirical research in any real way).

Check out this week’s highlights from the Christensen Institute. 
Christensen Institute · 92 Hayden Avenue · Lexington, MA 02421 · USA

April 8, 2021

New research: Six innovative strategies for creating new markets

Not one of their newsletters, but as I say each week…  From the neo-liberal, educational privatizers masquerading as an academic body – so the term research here is used VERY loosely (as none of this actually represents methodologically sound, reliable, valid, or empirical research in any real way).

Dear friends,

It’s widely acknowledged that innovation plays a pivotal role in shaping the economic fabric of nations. In particular, market-creating innovations—which democratize access to previously exclusive products—are integral for creating shared prosperity.

Yet, as important as market creation is for economies—and indeed organizations—the phenomenon remains clouded in mystery, with successful attempts often attributed to luck and good timing. Consequently, starting new ventures, particularly in emerging markets where many market-creating opportunities lie, appears inordinately risky. This perceived risk regrettably causes would-be entrepreneurs and investors to shy away from creating new and impactful businesses.

In order to demystify the process of building market-creating innovations, my colleague Lincoln Wilcox and I studied 100 market-creating organizations whose efforts have focused on creating sustainable new markets that serve ignored populations of consumers. Spanning history, industry, and the globe, organizations profiled include global powerhouses as well as modern-day pioneers.

Despite the diversity of organizations studied, the results revealed that market-creating organizations have much more in common than simply luck, good timing, or the hard work of the innovators behind them. In fact, they tend to employ six common strategies in the ways they overcome broad challenges.

Please take a moment to review our new paper, Making your own luck in emerging economies: Six innovative strategies for creating new markets, and of course feel free to forward to any innovators, investors, and policymakers you think might benefit from its insights.

Best wishes,

Efosa Ojomo

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Christensen Institute · 92 Hayden Avenue · Lexington, MA 02421 · USA

April 2, 2021

Why school districts don’t always choose curriculum that ‘experts’ think is best

As I say each week…  From the neo-liberal, educational privatizers masquerading as an academic body – so the term research here is used VERY loosely (as none of this actually represents methodologically sound, reliable, valid, or empirical research in any real way).

Check out this week’s highlights from the Christensen Institute. 
Christensen Institute · 92 Hayden Avenue · Lexington, MA 02421 · USA

April 1, 2021

New video: Why does poverty persist? An introduction to the prosperity paradox

This one appears to be their more generalized newsletter…  But either way, it’s still from the neo-liberal, educational privatizers masquerading as an academic body – so the term research here is used VERY loosely (as none of this actually represents methodologically sound, reliable, valid, or empirical research in any real way).

Check out this month’s highlights from the Christensen Institute.
Christensen Institute · 92 Hayden Avenue · Lexington, MA 02421 · USA

March 31, 2021

Why More Schools Haven’t Rethought Student Learning

Filed under: virtual school — Michael K. Barbour @ 10:07 pm
Tags: , , , ,

An item from a business professor with little direct experience in education, but who believes free market economic principles are the answer to education’s (and pretty much all other society’s social) problems.

Why More Schools Haven’t Rethought Student Learning

Plus, The Robots Are Coming, But So Are Investments In Human Capital

It’s no secret that I’ve been frustrated at the inability of many schools to fundamentally rethink the learning experience that they offer students over the past 12 months.

Many schools have instead focused on logistics and operations—which are important given health concerns, but also insufficient.

As schools reopen—and many offer or even require summer school, Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona told Education Week in an interview that they shouldn’t just replicate the traditional experience. “any summer learning enrichment experience really needs to be re-engaging students in a community of learners. That’s done through experiential learning, getting outdoors, doing projects, [while] maintaining the health and safety standards that are required, to really re-engaging them with experiences.”

But will schools heed the call and start to design new student learning experiences? There are a whole bunch of what you might call the “standard” reasons one might assume not. Things around balancing so many community concerns with limited resources, federal, state and local regulations, and work contracts that often limit educators’ responses.

In my latest piece for Forbes, I discuss another one—one that Clark Gilbert, now the president of BYU Pathway Worldwide, uncovered in his doctoral research many years ago. It’s call threat rigidity response, and it’s something that many schools are suffering from right now in my estimation. But Gilbert’s research also points to a playbook for how to escape it. Read more and let me know what you think.

The robots are coming

It might not quite be the cry that Paul Revere never actually uttered, but it’s induced fear in plenty of workers.

For the first time, the majority of robots ordered last year in North America won’t be going to automotive factories. Instead, companies in the consumer goods, pharmaceutical, and biomedical industries are responsible for a significant upturn in orders.

The COVID-19 pandemic made new standards for social distancing critical, and that, in turn, has empowered companies to turn to robots. Employers across the country turbocharged their investments in technology and automation. These accelerated investments, combined with a crippling recession and mass layoffs, disproportionately affected low-wage workers, women, and underrepresented minorities.

But there’s some good news for workers, as my Guild Education colleague CJ Jackson and I wrote for the MIT Sloan Management Review in “A Paradox No More: Investing in Automation and People.”

Automation is here, but so too is a deeper appreciation for and investment in things like upskilling, learning and development, and education for all workers.

There’s a simple explanation underlying this apparent paradox.

Check out the full piece to learn more and read case studies of three companies making these critical investments in education and upskilling—Walmart, Chipotle, and Discover Financial Services.

Secretaries of Education Spellings & King Join Future U

Jeff Selingo and I were honored to have two former Secretaries of Education join us on the latest episode of Future U.

Secretary Margaret Spellings served in President George W. Bush’s administration and Secretary John King served in President Barack Obama’s administration. The conversation was notable for not just how civil it was, but how downright friendly it was. There was a remarkable amount of agreement.

I encourage you all to listen to the episode—not just for the moment where they both disagree with the premise of a question I posed (as well as my reaction later on)—but to hear what they are focused on for the next four years.

Now this isn’t to say that they had no disagreements. They did, but they weren’t strong ones, and they didn’t lean into them. They instead emphasized their commitment to student outcomes above all else. Vehement agreement from me on that one.

There was much to take away from the conversation—not only in substance, but also in how we have these conversations.

One more time on pandemic pods?

Finally, there was another article on pandemic pods worth reading in Good Housekeeping. Titled “My Pandemic Pod Blew Up—As It Turns Out, They Weren’t Made to Last,” it spotlights the inevitable challenges parents have faced as they’ve run learning pods for their children during the pandemic, as well as the human cost of those challenges.

As always, thanks for reading, listening, and writing.

Comment Share

You’re on the free list for The Future of Education.

© 2021 Michael B. Horn
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.