Virtual School Meanderings

April 23, 2013

IT6230 – You Must Learn Online

itlogoAs I mentioned a few weeks ago in IT6230 – Internet In The Classroom, I will be using this blog as a way to provide discussion prompts for students in my IT6230 course (Internet in the Classroom).

For your final blog entry for IT6230 I want you to become familiar with political aspects of virtual schooling by reading the article entitled “Mich. floats online learning requirement: State could be first to insist on virtual instruction as a condition for graduation”, which appeared over four years ago in eSchool News, below.

Then, review the following blog entries that I have posted concerning the debate over full-time K-12 online learning in Michigan last year.

Finally, while much of this has already been decided in Michigan, many other states are still grappling with these issues (see AJC Is Looking At Online Learning In Georgia).

Once you have completed these readings and using them, in addition to what you have recently discovered about virtual schooling, imagine you are a teacher in one of the states deciding whether to make K-12 online learning a graduation requirement for all students and your legislator has contacted you for your thoughts on this legislation as he/she prepares for the debate. Your task is to write a 100-200 word response to your legislator expressing and most importantly, supporting, your view on this legislation.

Your own response to this prompt should be posted by the end of the day on Friday, 26 April. There is no requirement for you to comment on the blog of your fellow students, although it is always encouraged.

If you are not a student in my IT6230 course but would like to participate in this discussion, please leave a comment below.

Mich. floats online learning requirement
State could be first to insist on virtual instruction as a condition for graduation

From eSchool News staff and wire service reports
February 10, 2006

A pioneering proposal now before the Michigan state legislature would make Michigan the first state in the country to require students to experience some sort of online instruction before they graduate from high school.

Advocates for virtual instruction say that if the plan is approved, Michigan likely will set a precedent for other states to follow as more schools begin to experiment with the benefits of online learning.

The online learning mandate is part of larger piece of legislation designed to ratchet up high school graduation requirements across the state. Until now, Michigan students have been required only to take a civics course to graduate. The new proposal would require math, science, and a foreign language in addition to some form of online instruction.

The idea for the virtual learning requirement reportedly came from a report produced by former State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Watkins in September. Watkins, who published the report “Exploring E-Learning Reforms for Michigan: The New Education (R)evolution” while on sabbatical from Michigan’s Wayne State University, recommended that every school in the state adopt some form of eLearning as a means of extending course options and providing new ways to engage struggling students. Susan Patrick, executive director of the North American Council for Online Learning and former head of the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Educational Technology, called Michigan’s proposal “a bold plan” to foster a culture of lifelong learning and more readily prepare students for the challenges of an increasingly global economy.

“Michigan [officials have] realized that they have an industrial economy–they spawned the auto industry–but they face many of the challenges that other states face in making the transition to a more knowledge-based economy,” Patrick said She added, “I think the recommendation is terrific–and I think you are going to see more states following suit.” There already is strong support for online instruction in Michigan. At the Michigan Virtual University, enrollment in its Michigan Virtual High School program has grown from 100 students in 1999, the program’s first year, to 5,959 students during the 2004-05 school year, according to the Detroit Free Press.

The state’s online learning proposal is “probably one of the most forward-thinking educational strategies I’ve seen in a long time,” said Jamey Fitzpatrick, president of the nonprofit Michigan Virtual University. “It’s very exciting to see our policy makers engaged in the debate.”

Even if the measure doesn’t pass, he said, the fact that lawmakers were at least willing to entertain the idea proves that virtual instruction is growing in importance. The new graduation requirements were ratified by the state board of education in December and now stand before the state legislature.

Although no deadline has been set for approval, the measure so far has met with little opposition and appears to be on a “fast track” through the legislature, Fitzpatrick said. One item of concern is whether Michigan’s schools have the necessary infrastructure to support the online learning requirement.

In January, state House Republicans introduced a bill that would delay the start of the online mandate until the state board of education has determined that all high school students have equal access to computers and the internet, the Free Press reported.

But flexibility written into the plan’s requirement could ease lawmakers’ concerns. The measure says students can fulfill the mandate by having at least one “online learning experience.” This could include enrolling in an online course through the Michigan Virtual High School program, or simply taking an online test-preparation course or using electronic career-development software.

Supporters of the plan say this flexibility is one of its strengths.

“The last thing anyone wants to see is a cookie-cutter approach to education,” Fitzpatrick said.
Proponents are optimistic the bill will be approved by March so the new requirements can be in place for the graduating class of 2010, Fitzpatrick added.

Links:

Michigan Virtual University
http://www.mivu.org

North American Council for Online Learning
http://www.nacol.org
(note: now International Council for K-12 Online Learning – http://www.inacol.org)

Watkins’ report
http://www.coe.wayne.edu/e-learningreport.pdf

In case you are wondering, the readings for this week are:

Barbour, M. K. (2011). The promise and the reality: Exploring virtual schooling in rural jurisdictions. Education in Rural Australia, 21(1), 1-20.

Barbour, M. K., & Reeves, T. C. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers and Education, 52(2), 402-416.

April 16, 2013

IT6230 – Supporting Virtual Schooling

itlogoAs I mentioned a few weeks ago in IT6230 – Internet In The Classroom, I will be using this blog as a way to provide discussion prompts for students in my IT6230 course (Internet in the Classroom).

The five TEGIVS scenarios, as well as the three Michigan-based scenarios, were designed to introduce you to virtual schooling though which K-12 students learn via technology from a teacher who is at a distance. Because the teacher is only present virtually there is a need for local facilitation by the K-12 school. This rapidly increasing application of technology brings new challenges and opportunities to K-12 education. More specifically, the were three objectives:

  1. To understand Virtual Schooling
  2. To appreciate three main aspects of Virtual Schooling:
    • technology,
    • distant collaboration, and
    • local facilitation
  3. To start to become competent to facilitate and plan for Virtual Schooling

In this regard, based on the material in these scenarios, the content we have covered in class, and the course readings; how comfortable do you feel in being able to support a student or group of students at your school how might take an online course? What is the source of that confidence (or lack of confidence)?

You should post your response as an entry to your own blog by the end of the day on Friday, 19 April. In addition to the entry that you post on your own blog this week, make sure that you comment on at least THREE other students’ blogs by the end of the day on Monday, 22 April.

If you are not a student in my IT6230 course but would like to participate in this discussion, please leave a comment below. In case you are wondering, the readings for this week are:

Barbour, M. K. (2012). Training teachers for a virtual school system: A call to action. In D. Polly, C. Mims, & K. Persichitte (Eds)., Creating technology-rich teacher education programs: Key issues (pp. 499-517). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

April 9, 2013

IT6230 – Student Anxiety

itlogoAs I mentioned a few weeks ago in IT6230 – Internet In The Classroom, I will be using this blog as a way to provide discussion prompts for students in my IT6230 course (Internet in the Classroom).

Visit the “Student Anxiety” module created by Amina Charania, a graduate student at Iowa State University.

After you have viewed the multimedia presentation, respond to the following…

What changed Susan’s excitement into anxiety about her new online course? As an online teacher or course designer what steps would you have taken to prevent Susan’s anxiety about the course? As a school-based teacher at Susan’s school, what steps would you have taken to ease Susan’s anxiety about the course?

Your own response to this prompt should be posted by the end of the day on Friday, 12 April You should comment on THREE other students’ blogs by the end of the day on Monday, 15 April.

If you are not a student in my IT6230 course but would like to participate in this discussion, please leave a comment below. In case you are wondering, the readings for this week are:

Barbour, M. K. (2010). Researching K-12 online learning: What do we know and what should we examine? Distance Learning, 7(2), 7-12.

Barbour, M. K., Siko, J. (2012). Virtual schooling through the eyes of an at-risk student: A case study. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 15(1). Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2012/Barbour_Siko.pdf

April 2, 2013

IT6230 – Student Age

itlogoAs I mentioned a few weeks ago in IT6230 – Internet In The Classroom, I will be using this blog as a way to provide discussion prompts for students in my IT6230 course (Internet in the Classroom).

This is actually a prompt that I found at the Penn Foster Blog in an entry entitled “Are Older Students Better at Learning Online?“.

Younger students tend to be more familiar with the technology used in online instruction, but that doesn’t mean they’re more successful in virtual courses.

In a recent Inside Higher Ed article (http://www.insidehighered.com/advice/instant_mentor/weir7), online teacher Rob Weir argues that older students make better online learners:

“Younger students love the idea of online courses, but they are often the worst students — despite their greater facility with technology. Yahoo! runs ads for ‘Why online college is rocking,’ and that’s part of the problem. Online education is being sold as if it’s for everyone, when those finding real success are those who are self-motivated, highly organized, and in possession of well-developed study habits?…Younger students approach online classes as if they’re just another ‘cool’ thing to do on the Web. Be prepared to badger them if you want them to get through your course.”

Students with experience meeting deadlines are certainly at an advantage. But, I’d argue that most young students are beyond enrolling in a program because they think it’s ‘cool.’

Do you think age is a determinant in online learning success?

To view Jamie’s article on About.com – click here (http://distancelearn.about.com/b/2009/05/18/are-older-students-better-at-learning-online.htm)

You should post your response as an entry to your own blog by the end of the day on Friday, 05 April. In addition to the entry that you post on your own blog this week, make sure that you comment on at least THREE other students’ blogs by the end of the day on Monday, 08 April.

If you are not a student in my IT6230 course but would like to participate in this discussion, please leave a comment below. In case you are wondering, the readings for this week are:

Barbour, M. K. (2009). Today’s student and virtual schooling: The reality, the challenges, the promise… Journal of Distance Learning, 13(1), 5-25. Retrieved from http://journals.akoaotearoa.ac.nz/index.php/JOFDL/article/view/35

Roblyer, M. D. (2005). Who plays well in the virtual sandbox? Characteristics of successful online students and teachers. SIGTel Bulletin(2). Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Membership/SIGs/SIGTel_Telelearning_/SIGTel_Bulletin2/Archive/2005_20067/2005_July_-_Roblyer.htm

March 26, 2013

IT6230 – The School-Based Facilitator Or Mediating Teacher

itlogoAs I mentioned a few weeks ago in IT6230 – Internet In The Classroom, I will be using this blog as a way to provide discussion prompts for students in my IT6230 course (Internet in the Classroom).

The TEGIVS scenarios, as well as the Michigan-based scenarios, are designed to provide information and advice to school-based teachers on what K-12 virtual schooling looks like, some of the issues students face, how it is done, and how the mediating teachers can support it. Based on your use of all eight scenarios, along with the readings to date, our blogging discussions, the information and discussion in class, and your own experiences with K-12 virtual school; what are some of the topics that you think could be added to these scenarios, particularly the Michigan-based one, if more were developed in the future? Describe these ideas and what should be included.

You should post your response as an entry to your own blog by the end of the day on Friday, 29 March. In addition to the entry that you post on your own blog this week, make sure that you comment on at least THREE other students’ blogs by the end of the day on Monday, 01 April.

If you are not a student in my IT6230 course but would like to participate in this discussion, please leave a comment below. In case you are wondering, the readings for this week are:

Barbour, M. K. (2007). Portrait of rural virtual schooling. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 59. Retrieved on February 11, 2007 from http://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/articles/barbour.html

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.