Virtual School Meanderings

February 4, 2016

Education Week Commentary – Walton Family Foundation: We Must Rethink Online Learning

You know that it is bad when even the Walton Family Foundation is knocking this free market, neo-liberal education reform.

Published Online: January 26, 2016
Published in Print: January 27, 2016, as Walton Family Foundation: Rethink Virtual Charters

COMMENTARY

Walton Family Foundation: We Must Rethink Online Learning

By its very definition, innovation will always lead to some failed starts. And when that innovation involves educating children, it’s especially important to learn from mistakes and adjust quickly.

The Walton Family Foundation has invested more than $385 million in creating new charter schools over more than two decades to seed educational innovation and improve U.S. education at scale. The foundation has allocated a small fraction of that investment—about $550,000—to virtual charter schools, which teach full-time students exclusively online.

We remain strong believers in creating educational options and opportunities. We have provided startup dollars to about a quarter of the charter schools in the United States, all with the goal of creating opportunity for high-needs students, and we recently committed to investing another $1 billion over the next five years to expand access to high-quality educational choices. In recent years, we have hoped that online charter schools could provide a lifeline for some students. But while we were enthusiastic about supporting online education entrepreneurs, our first priority is always making sure that students are served well.


—iStockphoto

 

Measuring impact is fundamental to responsible philanthropy. It is a responsibility we take seriously. The Walton Family Foundation spends about $10 million annually underwriting the nation’s best researchers to investigate questions that will help us make smarter funding decisions to benefit high-needs students, develop promising new technologies and methods to fuel student learning, and help parents, educators, and policymakers improve outcomes for children.

As the largest private funder of charter schools and as strong believers in making fact-based decisions, we wanted to see the hard evidence on virtual charters: What would a dependable measure of the impact of these schools show about their students’ academic growth? We funded three research studies—by the Center for Research on Education Outcomes (or CREDO), at Stanford University; the Center on Reinventing Public Education, at the University of Washington; and Mathematica Policy Research—to investigate this question. As with all of our research dollars, we committed to funding these research teams regardless of what their investigations revealed.

The results are, in a word, sobering. The CREDO study found that over the course of a school year, the students in virtual charters learned the equivalent of 180 fewer days in math and 72 fewer days in reading than their peers in traditional charter schools, on average.

This is stark evidence that most online charters have a negative impact on students’ academic achievement. The results are particularly significant because of the reach and scope of online charters: They currently enroll some 200,000 children in 200 schools operating across 26 states. If virtual charters were grouped together and ranked as a single school district, it would be the ninth-largest in the country and among the worst-performing.


“As states think about the future of online education, they should rethink their expectations and policies and test novel policy arrangements.”


Funders, educators, policymakers, and parents cannot in good conscience ignore the fact that students are falling a full year behind their peers in math and nearly half a school year in reading, annually. For operators and authorizers of these schools to do nothing would constitute nothing short of educational malpractice.

As a result of these findings, we at the foundation will ask new, more rigorous questions of online charter operators when we review their funding proposals, in order to expose whether applicants are addressing the problems this research identified. In particular, we want to know: Are the operators suggesting innovative solutions to improve the quality of online learning? There is no magic formula here, but it is clear that what exists doesn’t create the academic opportunities children need. Going forward, we’ll probe deeply on applicants’ answers to the following questions:

What does the proposed instructional program look like? Just as it is important in traditional brick-and-mortar schools for students to spend time with teachers, virtual schools must provide plenty of time for students to learn and interact in live, synchronous ways with their teachers. In today’s online charters, students typically have less instructional time with their teachers in a whole week than students in brick-and-mortar schools have in a day. We don’t presume to know what the best pedagogical approach is for all children, but clearly this formula needs to change.

What are the proposed teacher-student ratios? Today’s online schools have much larger ratios than their brick-and-mortar counterparts. It’s unclear what the right balance is, but it seems clear that schools must facilitate interactions between students and teachers.


 

What are the expectations of parents? Virtual schools must help students learn without requiring parents to be constantly present and monitoring progress. Parents, of course, must be involved in their children’s education, but schools can’t abdicate their responsibility in this equation. Virtual charter educational providers should be thinking through the right role for parents and how schools will meet their own educational remits.

We urge policymakers to make changes, too. Charter authorizers—government-sanctioned bodies responsible for reviewing and approving charter operators—must take action if schools are failing students. And the oversight of educational practice applies to authorizers, as well as to schools and educators. Authorizers should be graded on the performance of their portfolios: If schools fail students, authorizers must take action. If they don’t, authorizers themselves should be put out of business.

Going forward, authorizers should create new accountability systems to ensure that no school fails, month after month and year after year. The review process must include observation of instruction and close review of student and parent expectations. We think a shorter review cycle, rather than waiting years, might catch problems earlier.

As states think about the future of online education, they should rethink their expectations and policies and test novel policy arrangements. For example, one policy that we think has potential would tie funding to performance. Four states—Florida, Minnesota, New Hampshire, and Utah—are currently testing performance-based funding systems. Perhaps we’ll discover that providing virtual schools funding only after students demonstrate mastery is the right way to hold these publicly funded schools accountable.

That said, with this approach, it would be important to guard against perverse incentives that could arise. For example, policymakers would need to make sure that schools weren’t pushing out or otherwise neglecting students who are so far behind that getting them to pass required courses or summative assessments would appear extremely resource-intensive.

Other funding reforms worth considering are tracking enrollments and providing associated student-based funding each month, rather than annually. This would help prevent students from being easily forgotten.

To be clear, our comments about online charter schools are not an indictment of instructional technology or online learning more generally, nor how these stand to help create more high-quality educational options. Nor is this the Walton Family Foundation abandoning its mission of creating more educational opportunities for American children. There are many examples of technology being used in conventional classrooms in ways that enhance learning. New blended learning models are showing promise, as is allowing students to customize learning through the use of online platforms.

But the data from this study do not lie: Online education must be reimagined. Ignoring the problem—or worse, replicating failures—serves nobody.

Vol. 35, Issue 19, Pages 24-25, 27

June 22, 2015

Gain Insight from EdWeek Research Advisor

Note the blended learning item below…

Education<br />
Week Research Advisor
Access your free copies of Education Week‘s sponsored whitepapers today. Download insights and thought leadership from our sponsors.

The content of the whitepapers is from our sponsors and is not written by
Education Week nor any of its affiliates
whitepapers
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Nurturing the Middle School Mathematical Mind
Provided by DreamBox Learning | Read Whitepaper Now
7 Ways to Engage Students in Complex Texts
Provided by Amplify | Read Whitepaper Now
Student-Centered Learning with a Learning Platform
Provided by itslearning | Read Whitepaper Now
What You Need to Know to Support Blended Learning
Provided by Education Elements | Read Whitepaper Now
TECHNOLOGY
Beyond a Single Estimate of Effectiveness
Provided by SAS | Read Whitepaper Now
Message Received: A Guide for Building a Successful K-12 Communication Strategy
Provided by Blackboard | Read Whitepaper Now
2015 K-12 Wi-Fi Buyer’s Guide
Provided by Aerohive | Read Whitepaper Now

 

March 23, 2015

Project-Based Learning, Common Core, and Digital Content: New Spotlights From Education Week

From Saturday’s inbox…  Note the digital content and blended learning items…

Project-Based Learning, Common Core, and Digital Content: New Spotlights From Education Week
Download Education Week Spotlights.
NEW SPOTLIGHTS FROM EDUCATION WEEK
Education Week Spotlights contain essential news and commentary on the big issues. These Spotlights provide the information you need to understand the most talked-about topics. For a limited time, download these Spotlights for free.

Download the Spotlight on Common-Core InstructionCommon-Core Instruction

Explore how teachers are leading common-core implementation and review news and commentary on the new math and literacy standards.
Read more.

Download the<br />
Spotlight on Project-Based LearningProject-Based Learning

Delve into how teachers and leaders are making project-based learning a cornerstone of classroom instruction.
Read more.

Download the Spotlight<br />
on Using Digital ContentUsing Digital Content

Learn how teachers, districts, and publishers are navigating the expanding digital-content marketplace.
Read more.
Share: Facebook Twitter More...

OTHER SPOTLIGHTS AVAILABLE FOR FREE DOWNLOAD

E-Rate

Review the historic E-rate funding increase and consider the winners and losers of these changes.

Career Readiness

Read how teachers and schools are fostering career-ready skills.

Blended Learning

Explore the costs, benefits, and drawbacks of blended learning.

English/Language Arts for K-8

Learn how personalized learning, automated writing evaluations, and the common core are changing English and language arts instruction.

Elements of a Successful District

Read how district leaders are fostering innovation, research, and student and teacher engagement.

Math Instruction

Delve into the implications of the common core, blended learning, and more on math instruction.
Follow Us on Twitter       Like Us on Facebook       Follow Us on Goolge Plus       Find Us on LinkedIn
Update Preferences   |    Customer Care
This message was intended for mkbarbour@gmail.com. You are receiving this free e-newsletter because you are either a previous purchaser of an ERS publication or you requested it when you registered on edweek.org or teachermagazine.org.This free e-newsletter is a service of Editorial Projects in Education, Inc., 6935 Arlington Road, Suite 100, Bethesda, MD 20814. EPE is the publisher ofEducation Week, Digital Directions, Teacher Professional Development Sourcebook, edweek.org, teachermagazine.org, DigitalDirections.org,TeacherSourcebook.org, and TopSchoolJobs.org.

Copyright © 2014 Editorial Projects in Education.

This message was intended for: mkbarbour@gmail.com
You were added to the system July 24, 2009.

March 21, 2014

2013 Digital Learning Report Card

Last week I saw this blog entry come through my RSS reader – Digital Learning Now Shows State Progress.  If you aren’t familiar with this, it is the annual ranking of how states are progressing in implementing the neo-liberals agenda of education and digital education.  Believe it or not, that is the nice or politically correct description of the rankings.

The honest description is that it is a ranking of how easy companies can come in, set-up shop, get approval for sub-standard online programs, and then rape and pillage public education.

Either way, it isn’t an actual ranking of how well states are doing with digital learning!

Now the actual report for 2013 is available at http://reportcard.digitallearningnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/DLN_ReportCard_FINAL.pdf and the press release is available at http://www.digitallearningnow.com/press-release/2013-digital-learning-report-card-signals-progress-in-high-quality-digital-learning-options/.

The new state-by-state map isn’t available yet, but you can access the 2012 one at http://www.digitallearningnow.com/reportcard/#grade0.  It is interesting to actually look at individual state profiles.

I see that my current state, Connecticut, was dead last in 2012.  I’m kind of proud of my new state for that fact.  It is interesting to note some of the individual statements that each state is graded on.

2. All students must complete at least one online course to earn a high school diploma.

Limited research that is available indicates that learning at a distance in the K-12 environment has little, and even a negative, effect on their ability to learn at a distance later in life.

4. No school district may restrict student enrollment in full-time online school or in an individual online course through enrollment caps or geographic boundaries.

Research has shown that full-time online programs that have a managed growth and/or limited geographic reach have much greater success than those without either.

13. No additional burdens are placed on the approval and procurement processes for digital content beyond those for print content.

23. Online providers, including virtual charter schools, full-time online providers, and individual online course providers, are allowed to appeal decisions or revise and resubmit their applications after a denial.

24. multiple opportunities during the year are available for virtual charter schools, full-time online providers, and individual online course providers to apply for approval.

25. Approval of digital providers lasts for three or more years

History has shown that cyber charter providers have fought any additional regulations placed on them through initial and on-going approval. Yet, these criteria all run counter to a state’s ability to manage this criteria:

29. As determined by outcomes-based student-performance data, these poor performing schools and courses must be closed: a. virtual charter schools. b. full-time online schools. c. individual online course providers.

If there is little to no oversight and if it is almost impossible to block programs that have been shown to be of poor quality, it makes it difficult to closed or prevent poor performing schools.

34. The same per-pupil funding with the same payment process is provided to all virtual charter schools, full-time online schools, and individual online course providers, regardless of whether the school is public, charter, not-for-profit, or for-profit.

Research and ideologically-based policy documents, including those published by neo-liberal think tanks, have said that full-time online learning costs less. This is an effort to maximize profits, plain and simple.

Just more examples of how the neo-liberal agenda for K-12 online learning runs counter to available research.

November 10, 2013

The Latest White Papers On Education Technology

From Thursday’s inbox – a few K-12 online and blended learning…

This exclusive White Paper Library brings you the latest white papers in education technology, covering topics like flipped learning and teacher development, and so much more. New white papers are added to the library often so check back for the most recent white papers available.

I guess for ease we can name these groupings, we can use the ones I have included above. Also, can you please make sure that the webinar’s are listed in order that I have them listed above. Below each grouping is what we should write as the “intro’ at the top of each email.


How Online and Hybrid Learning Are Transforming Teacher Development

How Online and Hybrid Learning Are Transforming Teacher Development

Provided by eduplanet21
In traditional professional development, teachers receive training along with their colleagues, and they are expected to integrate this training into the classroom on their own, or in small professional learning communities. There is little personalized learning or pre-assessment of their individual needs. The “flipped” version of this process sees teachers accessing key resources in an organic and self-directed way—allowing for just-in-time, just-for-me learning of ideas based on their own curiosity.

Download Whitepaper


James Madison University Flu & Weather Proofs their courses with TechSmith

How One District Successfully Met the Needs of 163 Homebound Students–While Saving Money in the Process

Provided by K12
Read this free whitepaper to discover how K12 made it so none of the students who weren’t able to attend school were held back.

Download Whitepaper


James Madison University Flu & Weather Proofs their courses with TechSmith

How Flipped Learning Is Helping Stillwater Schools Differentiate Instruction

Provided by TechSmith
Teachers in Minnesota’s Stillwater Area Public Schools are using Camtasia software from TechSmith to create videos for students to watch outside of class. This has enabled teachers to increase one-on-one time with their students during school hours—turning the classroom into “more of a workshop where [teachers can] work with each student.”

Download Whitepaper


Get Easy Access to Industry-Leading Creativity Tools

Get Easy Access to Industry-Leading Creativity Tools

Provided by GovConnection
Adobe has created an easy-to-manage, term-based licensing program that gives schools access to new versions of Adobe Creative Cloud desktop applications. With this new program, schools and academic departments can have the creative tools they need to be more productive, foster creativity in teaching and learning, and help students develop the digital communication skills essential for success in college and beyond.

Download Whitepaper

Would you like your white paper to be included? Request information.

eSchool News, 7920 Norfolk Ave Suite 900. Bethesda, MD 20814 | Phone: 301-913-0115 . Fax: 301-913-0119
www.eSchoolNews.com | custserv@eSchoolNews.com 

Contents Copyright 2013 eCampus News. All rights reserved. 

Next Page »

The Rubric Theme. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,555 other followers