Virtual School Meanderings

March 21, 2020

[ET&S] TOC Alert: Journal Of Educational Technology & Society 2019, Vol. 22, No. 3

There are no K-12 distance, online, and/or blended learning specific articles in this issue.

Journal of Educational Technology & Society TOC Alert

Dear Subscriber,

The latest issue of “Journal of Educational Technology & Society” is now available on the ETS Journal Web Site.

The articles of the current issue is made available here. The following is the Table of Content of the issue

2019, Vol. 22, Issue 3

Special Issue on “Guidelines and Taxonomy for Educational Game and Gamification Design

Guest Editor(s): Rita Kuo, Maiga Chang

Guidelines and Taxonomy for Educational Game and Gamification Design

Rita Kuo, Maiga Chang

Special Issue Articles
Details on the Design and Evaluation Process of an Educational Game Considering Issues for Visually Impaired People Inclusion 

Luiz Valério Neto, Paulo H. F. Fontoura Junior, Rogério A. Bordini, Joice L. Otsuka, Delano M. Beder

Serious Game Design for Children: A Set of Guidelines and their Validation
Matheus V. Valenza, Isabela Gasparini, Marcelo da S. Hounsell
Simplifying the Creation of Adventure Serious Games with Educational Oriented Features
Pérez-Colado Víctor Manuel, Pérez-Colado Iván José, Freire-Morán Manuel, Martínez-Ortiz Iván, Fernández-Manjón Baltasar
How to Gamify Learning Systems? An Experience Report using the Design Sprint Method and a Taxonomy for Gamification Elements in Education
Armando M. Toda, Paula T. Palomino, Wilk Oliveira, Luiz Rodrigues, Ana C. T. Klock, Isabela Gasparini, Alexandra I. Cristea, Seiji Isotani
Full Length Articles
Validating and Modelling Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Integrative Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education

Ching Sing Chai, Morris Siu-Yung Jong, Hong-biao Yin, Mengyuan Chen, Wenye Zhou

Facilitating Inpatients’ Family Members to Learn: A Learning Engagement-Promoting Model to Develop Interactive E-Book Systems for Patient Education

Hsin Huang, Gwo-Jen Hwang

Using the ADDIE Model to Nurture the Development of Teachers’ CALL Professional Knowledge
Hui-Chin Yeh, Sheng-Shiang Tseng

Editorial Office,

Journal of Educational Technology and Society.
ET&S website:

December 4, 2019

[ET&S] TOC Alert: Journal of Educational Technology & Society 20 19, Vol. 22, No. 2

No K-12 distance, online, and/or blended learning items in this issue.

Journal of Educational Technology & Society TOC Alert

Dear Subscriber,

The latest issue of “Journal of Educational Technology & Society” is now available on the ETS Journal Web Site.

The articles of the current issue is made available here. The following is the Table of Content of the issue

2019, Vol. 22, Issue 2

Special Issue on “Language Learning in the Modern Digital Eraa”

Guest Editor(s): Yu-Ju Lan

Language Learning in the Modern Digital Era

Yu-Ju Lan

Special Issue Articles
In a World of SMART Technology, Why Learn Another Language?

Robert Godwin-Jones

Current and Future Directions in TELL
Dorothy M. Chun
Creating Digital Stories: EFL Learners’ Engagement, Cognitive and Metacognitive Skills
Shao-Ting Alan Hung
EFL Learners’ Intercultural Communication in an Open Social Virtual Environment
Meei-Ling Liaw
Full Length Articles
Effects of a Personalized Navigation Support Approach on Students’ Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning Performances

Wei Li, Chuang-Kai Chiu, Judy C. R. Tseng

From Social Interactions to Strategy and Skills Promotion: An ASQI-Based Mobile Flipped Billiards Training Approach to Improving Students’ Learning Engagement, Performance and Perceptions

Yen-Nan Lin, Lu-Ho Hsia

Impacts of Concept Map-Based Collaborative Mobile Gaming on English Grammar Learning Performance and Behaviors
Hui-Chun Chu, Chun-Chieh Wang, Lin Wang

Editorial Office,

Journal of Educational Technology and Society.
ET&S website:

September 20, 2019

Article Notice: A Systematic Approach To Improving E-Learning Implementations In High Schools

This isn’t a new article, but I only came across it late this past week (so I guess it was new to me).

TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – July 2014, volume 13 issue 3


Bens Pardamean and Teddy Suparyanto Graduate Program of Information Technology, Bina Nusantara University, Indonesia

ABSTRACT This study was based on the current growing trend of implementing e-learning in high schools. Most endeavors have been inefficient, rendering an objective of determining the initial steps that could be taken to improve these efforts by assessing a student population’s computer skill levels and performances in an IT course. Demographic factors were also taken into account while formulating these recommendations. Basic computer skill levels were measured through the administration of the Technical Survival Skill Test (TSST) questionnaire, developed by the University of Toronto. Academic performances were evaluated through several assignments designed by the IT course instructors. The main result of this study indicated that computer skill levels did have a direct correlation with a student’s academic performance level. The database was further parsed based on demographical factors, resulting in a set of recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of e-learning.

Keywords: learning management system, LMS, technical survival skill test, TSST

May 19, 2019

Media Release: Reports Shed New Light On California Charter Schools’ Fiscal Impact

Note that the only reference to cyber or virtual charter schools in this series is in the second report, where it indicates that they analysis excludes the 25,000 students who enrolled in virtual charter schools from their analysis.

I should also note that one of the difficulties with this type of costing analysis is that it assumed that the loss is uniform.  For example, if a district loses ~30 students and the associated funding that they can simply cut a class of students (as ~30 students is roughly one class).  The problem is that in these ~30 students there may be three grade 1 students, five grade two students, one grade three student and so on.  This means that the school would not be able to cut a single class of students, but make do with the lower level of funding while trying to accommodate the same number of grades and classes.

If you’re having trouble viewing this email, you may see it online.
Share this:
Media Release
Travis Pillow
Reports shed new light on California charter schools’ fiscal impact

Seattle, Wash. May 17, 2019 – The Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE) is releasing three briefs that challenge some commonly held beliefs about the impact California charter schools have on school districts.

The reports come as a state task force reviews potential charter school policy changes, and state lawmakers prepare to debate a series of bills affecting charter schools. They conclude:

Charter school growth does not account for all district enrollment declines. In the most recent school year (2018–2019), charter school enrollment growth can account for little or none of the enrollment loss experienced by Los Angeles and San Diego Unified school districts. In Oakland, the district gained more students than did charter schools. District enrollment losses stem from a combination of demographic shifts and students attending schools in nearby districts, private schools, homeschooling, or charter schools. Read our full brief on district enrollment losses.

There is no evidence that charter schools are to blame for fiscal distress in California school districts. Based on state data, we find no relationship between the share of students enrolled in charter schools and the likelihood school districts will enter fiscal distress. Between 1998 and 2015, an average of just 1.5 percent of school districts where charter schools enroll more than 10 percent of students entered fiscal distress. Read our full brief on district fiscal distress.

Charter schools have, according to available evidence, important benefits for California communities and limited costs to the state. Like all policies, charter schools impose costs and generate benefits for California students. For example, in Southern California and the Bay Area, they have been shown to lift student achievement in reading and math—and particularly for students who are black, Hispanic, and living in poverty. These benefits should be considered alongside any costs. Read our full brief on costs and benefits.

“Charter school policy is too important for California to get wrong,” said Robin Lake, CRPE’s director. “It is important for policymakers to carefully analyze the impact of charter schools for all California students, and the full range of challenges facing public education in the state.”

The reports and an accompanying blog post offer recommendations for policymakers:

1.  The state should work with school districts to develop more accurate budget and enrollment projections. This will help restore trust with taxpayers and teachers negotiating salaries, and enable an honest conversation with taxpayers and state policymakers about public schools’ funding needs.

2.  Policymakers should consider transition aid for districts where students leave for charter schools, as states like Massachusetts have done. This could help districts deal with costs they can’t easily shed, and compete more effectively to attract students.

3.  In districts struggling with the effects of persistent enrollment declines, charter schools and the state could pay into debt reduction funds that a district could tap if it made strides reducing costs and increasing financial transparency. Charter schools, in return, could receive improved access to district facilities.

For more information, or to arrange an interview with CRPE expert, please contact Travis Pillow at 407.376.3105 or

About CRPE

Part of the University of Washington Bothell, the Center on Reinventing Public Education is one of the nation’s leading sources for transformative, evidence-based ideas to improve education. To ensure all students are prepared for a rapidly changing future, CRPE puts forward rigorous research and policy analysis to help educators, policymakers, civic and community leaders, parents, and students themselves reimagine education systems and structures. Learn more about CRPE’s current research here.
Center on Reinventing Public Education
Improving education through transformative,
evidence-based ideas about/research/etc
600 1st Avenue, Suite 206 | Seattle, WA 98104 United States

Got this as a forward? Sign up to receive our future emails.

April 23, 2019

Article Notice – K–12 Blended Teaching Readiness: Model And Instrument Development

This article came across my electronic desk last week sometime.  It appears that the volume that it will formally appear in has not be released yet, but it appears here in the “Articles First” portion of the journal.

Publication Cover

K–12 Blended Teaching Readiness: Model and Instrument Development

Charles R. Graham,Jered Borup, Emily Pulham & Ross Larsen
Received 23 Aug 2018, Accepted 20 Feb 2019, Published online: 17 Apr 2019


An increasing number of K–12 schools have adopted blended learning approaches. Current empirical research has been sparse regarding preparing teachers for blended teaching, including the skills they must develop to teach in blended contexts. This research is focused on that weakness, with the purposes of systematically identifying the skills needed for teaching in a blended learning context and of developing and testing an instrument that can be used to determine individual and school-wide readiness for blended teaching. In this study we present a measurement model used to develop items for measuring K–12 blended learning readiness. Specifically the instrument contained the following top-level areas: (a) foundational knowledge, skills, and dispositions, (b) instructional planning, (c) instructional methods and strategies, (d) assessment and evaluation, and (e) management. Each top-level construct also had two to four subconstructs. Through confirmatory factor analysis using survey responses from 2,290 K–12 teachers we found that the data met all four fit statistics cutoffs set forth in the literature (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA]= 0.041, comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.926, Tucker–Lewis index [TLI] = 0.923, standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.041, X2 = 978.934, df = 1992).

Keywords:: K–12 blended learningblended teaching competencies
Next Page »

Blog at