Virtual School Meanderings

April 11, 2018

ETS TOC Alert: Journal Of Educational Technology & Society 2018, Vol. 21, No. 2

No K-12 distance, online, or blended learning items in this issue.

Journal of Educational Technology & Society TOC Alert

Dear Subscriber,

The latest issue of “Journal of Educational Technology & Society” is now available on the ETS Journal Web Site.

2018, Vol. 21, Issue 2

Special Issue on ” Digital Citizenship: Trends and Research Issues of Learning Analytics and Educational Big Data”

Guest Editor(s): Gwo-Jen Hwang, Daniel Spikol and Kam-Cheong Li

Full Length Articles

Multilingual Videos for MOOCs and OER

Juan Daniel Valor Miró, Pau Baquero-Arnal, Jorge Civera, Carlos Turró, Alfons Juan

A Structural Model for Students’ Adoption of Learning Management Systems: An Empirical Investigation in the Higher Education Context

Duygu Fındık-Coşkunçay, Nurcan Alkış, Sevgi Özkan-Yıldırım

Instructional Suggestions Supporting Science Learning in Digital Environments Based on a Review of Eye Tracking Studies

Fang-Ying Yang, Meng-Jung Tsai, Guo-Li Chiou, Silvia Wen-Yu Lee, Cheng-Chieh Chang, Li-Ling Chen

High School Students’ Views on the PBL Activities Supported via Flipped Classroom and LEGO Practices

Baris Cukurbas, Mubin Kiyici

Evolving Learning Paradigms: Re-Setting Baselines and Collection Methods of Information and Communication Technology in Education Statistics

David Gibson, Tania Broadley, Jill Downie, Peter Wallet

Are Games Effective Learning Tools? A Review of Educational Games

Sara de Freitas

Teaching Classical Mechanics Concepts using Visuo-haptic Simulators

Luis Neri, Julieta Noguez, Victor Robledo-Rella, David Escobar-Castillejos, Andres Gonzalez-Nucamendi

The Effects of Representation Tool (Visible-Annotation) Types to Support Knowledge Building in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Yoonhee Shin, Dongsik Kim, Jaewon Jung

Modelling and Simulating Electronics Knowledge: Conceptual Understanding and Learning through Active Agency

Adrian Twissell

Representations of Animal Companions on Student Learning Perception: Static, Animated and Tangible

Zhi-Hong Chen, Sheng-Chun Wang

Editorial

Digital Citizenship: Trends and Research Issues of Learning Analytics and Educational Big Data

Special Issue Articles

Learning Behavior Analysis of a Ubiquitous Situated Reflective Learning System with Application to Life Science and Technology Teaching

Wu-Yuin Hwang, Hong-Ren Chen, Nian-Shing Chen, Li-Kai Lin, Jin-Wen Chen

Learning Analytics for Supporting Seamless Language Learning using E-book with Ubiquitous Learning System

Kousuke Mouri, Noriko Uosaki, Hiroaki Ogata

How Competition in a Game-based Science Learning Environment Influences Students’ Learning Achievement, Flow Experience, and Learning Behavioral Patterns

Ching-Huei Chen, Jun-Han Liu, Wen-Chuan Shou

A Votable Concept Mapping Approach to Promoting Students’ Attentional Behavior: An Analysis of Sequential Behavioral Patterns and Brainwave Data

Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Yu-Yan Lin, Shih-Jou Yu, Liu-Cheng Pan, Ariel Yu-Zhen Chen

Using a Learner-Topic Model for Mining Learner Interests in Open Learning Environments

Pengfei Wu, Shengquan Yu, Dan Wang

A Learning Analytics Approach to Investigating Factors Affecting EFL Students’ Oral Performance in a Flipped Classroom

Chi-Jen Lin, Gwo-Jen Hwang

Applying Learning Analytics for the Early Prediction of Students’ Academic Performance in Blended Learning

Owen H.T. Lu, Anna Y.Q. Huang, Jeff C. H. Huang, Albert J. Q. Lin, Hiroaki Ogata, Stephen J. H. Yang

Personalized Word-Learning based on Technique Feature Analysis and Learning Analytics

Di Zou, Haoran Xie

What Learning Analytics Tells Us: Group Behavior Analysis and Individual Learning Diagnosis based on Long-Term and Large-Scale Data

Jia-Hua Zhang, Ye-Xing Zhang, Qin Zou, Sen Huang

A Comparison between Two Automatic Assessment Approaches for Programming: An Empirical Study on MOOCs

Anis Bey, Patrick Jermann, Pierre Dillenbourg

Learning Analytics at Low Cost: At-risk Student Prediction with Clicker Data and Systematic Proactive Interventions

Samuel P. M. Choi, S.S. Lam, Kam Cheong Li, Billy T.M. Wong

A Peer Coaching-based Professional Development Approach to Improving the Learning Participation and Learning Design Skills of In-Service Teachers

Ning Ma, Shuang Xin, Jia-Yuan Du

Peer Assessment of Webpage Design: Behavioral Sequential Analysis Based on Eye Tracking Evidence

Ting-Chia Hsu, Shao-Chen Chang, Nan-Cen, Liu

Effects of a Progressive Prompting-based Educational Game on Second Graders’ Mathematics Learning Performance and Behavioral Patterns

Kai-Hsiang Yang, Hui-Chun Chu, Li-Yu Chiang


March 29, 2018

Article Notice – Conventional Classroom Teaching through ICT And Distance Teaching: A Case Study From Greenland

In addition to the “Guest Editorial,” there was article in that special issue that focused on K-12 online learning in the Volume 13, Issue 1 of the Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy special issue on “online learning.”

Conventional classroom teaching through ICT and distance teaching: A case study from Greenland
avAnders Øgaard

Side: 9-23
DOI: 10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2018-01-02

Sammendrag: Conditions for schooling in Greenland are challenging in many ways. The staff of teachers in the country is very heterogeneous: some have teacher training, but many are without, and often work with limited resources. Distance teaching could be a tool to share teaching resources and raise the quality of teaching in the many small isolated communities and settlements.

This paper presents a case study on distance teaching in a school in Greenland. Data from work on Grounded Theory is used to investigate ways of utilizing distance teaching in the school. The analysis draws on a prevalent perspective on distance teaching as providing access to education. The perspective combines with Michel Foucault’s concept of “governmentality”.

I will show how progressive possibilities are not necessarily to be found in ICT-driven distance teaching. Pedagogical drivers operate behind the choices of ICT equipment and ICT solutions which, in this case, brings ICT under the command of a less progressive pedagogical agenda.

As I will show, the commitment from the municipality and from the teachers was to use distance teaching and ICT for conventional schooling. The case lays the ground for a discussion on the progressivity of distance teaching and the use of advanced ICT solutions in schools. My aim with the paper is to add to the understanding of the scope of distance teaching in schools. Does ICT and distance teaching serve progressive ends per se? What do we learn about distance teaching from this setup in the school in Greenland?

Keywords: Distance teaching, e-learning, online, ICT, K-12, settlements, Greenland, Michel Foucault

To continue reading, click here.

Article Notice – Guest Editorial: Online Learning

Yesterday I posted a notice of the Volume 13, Issue 1 of the Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, which was a special issue focused on online learning.

Guest editorial
Cathrine Tømte

Side: 5-8DOI: 10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2018-01-01

Online learning—understood as distance education delivered via the internet—is one of the fastest growing paths within education. We observe an increasing number of students enrolled in online learning study programs and courses, and in higher education institutions regular campus-based education are incorporating elements from online learning too. Several causes are driving the growing number of online students and the hybridization of campus-based education. One is the emergence of new groups of students i.e. adult learners who combine studies with work and who cannot attend campus-based education; another is existing student groups expecting a greater part of the study material to be digitalized and made available online. In addition, the recent wave of mergers in higher education institutions, both in the Nordic countries and in Europe, has created multi-campus institutions that need to draw on teaching resources at several locations (Bates, 2015; Gaebel et al., 2014).

To continue reading, click here.

This article can also be accessed at:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323809333_Guest_editorial_Online_learning_in_the_Nordic_countries

March 28, 2018

Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 13(1) – Table of Contents

This came across my electronic desk late last week.

cover_image_/file/ci/67049775/dk_2018_01_2x.jpgNordic Journal of Digital Literacy

01/2018
13(1)

Guest editorial
(pages 5-8)
av Cathrine Tømte
Open access

Conventional classroom teaching through ICT and distance teaching
A case study from Greenland
(pages 9-23)
av Anders Øgaard
Open access

Digital professional development: towards a collaborative learning approach for taking higher education into the digitalized age
(pages 24-39)
av Inger Dagrunn Langset, Dan Yngve Jacobsen og Halvdan Haugsbakken

Open access

An Analysis of Participants’ Experiences from the First International MOOC Offered at the University of Oslo
(pages 40-64)
av Ammar Bahadur Singh og Anders I. Mørch

March 26, 2018

Article Notice – Online Student Use of a Proximate Community of Engagement at an Independent Study Program

Last week I posted a notice of a New Issue Of Online Learning Journal Published.  Below is the information for the sole K-12 distance, online, and blended learning article contained in that issue.

Darin R Oviatt, Charles R. Graham, Jered Borup, Randall S Davies

 

Abstract

Research has suggested that independent study students may benefit from engaging with a proximate community of engagement (PCE) while completing an online course and that they perceive that such engagement will help them succeed. Independent Study students were surveyed at the completion of their course to assess the level at which they actually interacted with a PCE. Survey findings were confirmed with follow-up interviews with students and their parents to triangulate survey data. Findings revealed that students in the study interacted with a PCE when completing the course. The percentage of students actually engaging with a PCE was lower than the percentages of students from a previous study who perceived that such engagement would be helpful. The research suggests that students made aware of the benefits of a PCE at the beginning of the course, and who receive coaching to curate that community as an assignment in the course, will be more likely to receive the learning benefits of community engagement. Future research to confirm the value of engaging with a proximate community, identifying most helpful and effective interactions, and helping students curate such a community were proposed.

Keywords

Independent study, adolescent, online courses, online community, adolescent community of engagement, proximate community of engagement

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahn, J. (2011). Policy, technology, and practice in cyber charter schools: Framing the issues. Teachers College Record, 113(1), 1-26.

Anderson, T. (2008). Towards a theory of online learning. In T.

Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 45-74). Edmonton, Canada: AU Press.

Authors (2016).

Authors (2014).

Authors (2013a).

Authors (2013b).

Barbour, M. (2009). Today’s student and virtual schooling: The reality, the challenges, the promise. Journal of Distance Learning, 13(1), 5-25. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1078&context=ced_fac

Barbour, M., & Reeves, T. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 52(2), 402-416. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.009

Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118-126. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.006

Borup, J. (2016). Teacher perceptions of parental engagement at a cyber high school. Journal of Research in Technology in Education, 48(2), 67-83. doi:10.1080/15391523.2016.1146560

Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Drysdale, J. S. (2014). The nature of teacher engagement at an online high school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 793–806. doi:10.1111/bjet.12089

Borup, J., West, R. E., Graham, C. R., & Davies, R. S. (2014). The adolescent community of engagement: A framework for research on adolescent online learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 107-129. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.011

Cavanaugh, C. (2013). Student achievement in elementary and high school. In M. G. More (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education (3rd Ed., pp. 170-184). New York: Routledge.

Cavanaugh, C., Barbour, M., & Clark, T. (2009). Research and practice in K-12 online learning: A review of open access literature. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(1), 1-22. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/607/1182

Cavanaugh, C., Gillan, K. J., Kromrey, J., Hess, M., & Blomeyer, R. (2004). The effects of distance education on K–12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED489533.pdf

Chan, P., Wilkinson, J., Graham, C., Borup, J., & Skeen, J. (2011). Blended Learning: Transforming Teacher Roles in 21st Century Education. In Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2011 (pp. 1089-1096). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.

Corrigan, H., & Craciun, G. (2012). Wearing More Than One Hat: Improving Student-Authored Case Longevity While Encouraging Additional Student Roles. Marketing Education Review, 22(1), 33-37. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008220106

Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Daum, D. N., & Buschner, C. (2014). Research on teaching blended and online physical education. In R. M. Ferdig & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Handbook of Research on K-12 Online and Blended Learning (pp. 201-222). ETC Press. Retrieved from: http://press.etc.cmu.edu/files/Handbook-Blended-Learning_Ferdig-Kennedy-etal_web.pdf

Davies, R. (2008). Designing a response scale to improve average group response reliability. Evaluation & Research in Education, 21(2), 132-144.

de la Varre, C., Keane, J., & Irvin, M. J. (2011). Dual perspectives on the contribution of on-site facilitators to teaching presence in a blended learning environment. The Journal of Distance Education, 25(3). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/751/1285

Erb, R. E. (2004). From traditional public school to cyber charter: How parents decide. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.

eschool, (n.d.). Parent Role and Expectations. Retrieved from http://eschool.k12.hi.us/parents/parent-role-expectations

Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis. London: Routledge.

Farrell, G.M. (Ed.), (1999). The Development of Virtual Education: A Global Perspective. Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver, British Columbia.

Ferdig, R. E., Cavanaugh, C., DiPietro, M., Black, E., & Dawson, K. (2009). Virtual schooling standards and best practices for teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 479 – 503.

FLVS (2016). Student and parent handbook: 2016-2017 school year. Retrieved from https://www.flvs.net/docs/default-source/district/student_parent_handbook.pdf?sfvrsn=20

Garrett Dikkers, A., Whiteside, A. L., & Lewis, S. (2013). Virtual high school teacher and student reactions to the social presence model. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 12(3), 156–170.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Gemin, B., Pape, L., Vashaw, L., & Watson, J. (2015). Keeping pace with K-12 digital learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Evergreen Education Group. Retrieved from http://www.kpk12.com/wpcontent/uploads/Evergreen_KeepingPace_2015.pdf

Gill, B., Walsh, L., Wulsin, C. S., Matulewicz, H., Severn, V., Grau, E., . . . & Kerwin, T. (2015). Inside online charter schools. Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from https://www.mathematica-mpr.com/our-publications-and-findings/publications/inside-online-charter-schools.

Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems (12)4, 436-445. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/798843

Glass, V. G. (2009). The realities of K-12 virtual education. Boulder, CO and Tempe, AZ: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit. Retrieved from http://epicpolicy.org/files/PB-Glass-VIRTUAL.pdf

Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1998). Transcript analysis of computer-mediated conferences as a tool for testing constructivist and social-constructivist learning theories. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning (pp. 139-144). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Harms, C. M., Niederhauser, D. S., Davis, N. E., Roblyer, M. D., & Gilbert, S. (2006). Educating educators for virtual schooling: Communicating roles and responsibilities. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 16(1&2), 1-13. Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/016/1/01611.HTML

Hasler Waters, L. (2012). Exploring the experiences of learning coaches in a cyber charter school: A qualitative case study (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3569079).

Hasler Waters, L., & Leong, P. (2014). Who is teaching? New roles for teachers and parents in cyber charter schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 33-56.

Hasler Waters, L., Menchaca, M. P., & Borup, J. (2014). Parental involvement in k-12 online and blended learning. In R. E. Ferdig & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning (pp. 303-324). Retrieved from http://press.etc.cmu.edu/content/handbook-research-k-12-online-and-blended-learning-0

iNACOL. (2013). Fast facts about online learning. Vienna, VA. Retrieved from http://www.inacol.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/iNACOL-Fast-Facts-About-Online-Learning-October-2013.pdf

Kanuka, H. (2008). Understand e-learning technologies-in-practice through philosophies-in-practice. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 91-118). Edmonton, Canada: AU Press.

Kreijns, K., Kirschner, Paul A., Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335-353.

LANV (n.d.). Parent Expectations. Retrieved from https://www.lanv.org/methods/parent-expectations/

Michigan Virtual University (2016a). Parent guide to online learning, version 4. Retrieved from http://media.mivu.org/institute/pdf/parentguide.pdf.

Michigan Virtual University (2016b). Mentor fundamentals: A guide to mentoring online learners, version 2. Retrieved from https://micourses.org/resources/pdf/toolkit/mentorguide.pdf

Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.

OʼHanlon, C. (2009). Credit recovery software: the new summer school. THE Journal, 36(2), 16-19. Retrieved from https://thejournal.com/Articles/2009/02/01/Credit-Recovery-Software-the-New-Summer-School.aspx

O’Leary, P. F., & Quinlan, T. J. (2007). Learner–instructor telephone interaction: Effects on satisfaction and achievement of online students. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 133-143. doi:10.1080/08923640701341661

Oliver, K., Osborne, J., Patel, R., & Kleimann, G. (2009). Issues surrounding the deployment of a new statewide virtual public school. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(1), 37–49.

OVA (2015). Ohio virtual academy parent handbook: 2015-2016. Retrieved from: http://ohva.k12.com/content/dam/schools/ohva/files/ohva_handbook_15-16.pdf

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 35-40.

Potter, J. (1998). Beyond access: Student perspective on support service needs in distance education. The Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 24(1), 59–82.

Rice, K. L. (2006). A comprehensive look at distance education in the K-12 context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 425-448.

Roblyer, M. D., & Marshal, J. C. (2002). Predicting success of virtual high school students: Preliminary results from an educational success prediction instrument. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(2), 241-255.

Shea, P., Li, C. S., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175-190. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005

Snyder, L. (1997). A virtual school program (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta

Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K-12 blended learning: Profiles of emerging models. Innosight Institute. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/The-rise-of-K-12-blended-learning.emerging-models.pdf

Stevens, M., & Borup, J. (2015). Parental engagement in online learning environments: A review of the literature. In M. F. Rice (Ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching Volume 25: Exploring Pedagogies for Diverse K12 Online Learners. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.

Student Success Toolboox (2016). Who can I ask. Retrieved from http://studentsuccess.ie/toolbox/tool3/#/hub

Watson, J., & Gemin, B. (2008) Promising practices in online learning: Using online learning for at-risk students and credit recovery. Vienna, VA: iNACOL. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509625.pdf

Watson, J., Pape, L., Murin, A., Gemin, B., & Vashaw, L. (2014). Keeping pace with K-12 digital learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Evergreen Education Group. Retrieved from http://www.kpk12.com/wp-content/uploads/KeepingPace_2004.pdf

Weiner, C. (2003). Key ingredients to online learning: Adolescent students study in cyberspace-the nature of the study. International Journal on e-Learning, 2(3), 44-50. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/noaccess/14497/

Wicks, M. (2010). A national primer on K-12 online learning, Version 2. Matthew Wicks and Associates. Retrieved from http://www.inacol.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/iNCL_NationalPrimerv22010-web1.pdf

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1153

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.