The third – and final – K-12 distance, online and blended learning article from yesterday’s [OLJ] New Online Learning Issue Published entry.
AbstractThis article examined a blended learning initiative in a large suburban high school in the Midwestern region of the United States. It employed a single-case exploratory design approach to learn about the experience of administrators, teachers, students, and parents. Using Zimmerman’s Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) Theory as a guiding framework, this study explored surveys, face-to-face observation data, interview transcriptions, and focus group transcriptions to learn about different stakeholders’ experiences and their observations about student readiness for blended learning. As a result, the data suggested three major themes, namely how blended learning initiatives can promote autonomy and self-regulation, encourage inquiry and build relationships, and ultimately help students feel ready for college.
KeywordsSelf-regulated learning, blended learning, K-12 education, case study research
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade level: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.
Babbie, E. (1973). Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 1-6.
Bertrand, W. E. (2010). Higher education and technology transfer: The effects of “techno-sclerosis” on development. Journal of International Affairs, 64(1), 101—119.
Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation. (2016). Blended learning. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/blended-learning/
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment 6(4),
Effeney, G., Carroll, A., & Bahr, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning and executive function: Exploring the relationships in a sample of adolescent males. Educational Psychology, 33(7), 773—796. doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.785054.
Garrison, R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering it transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
Garrett Dikkers, A., Whiteside, A. L., & Lewis, S. (forthcoming). Blending face-to-face and online instruction to disrupt learning, inspire reflection, and create space for innovation. In A. Whiteside,
A. Garrett Dikkers, & K. Swan (Eds.), Social presence in online learning: Multiple perspectives on practice and research. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Garrett Dikkers, A., Whiteside, A. L., & Lewis, S. (2014, December). Do you blend? Huntley High School does. eLearn Magazine, 2014(12). doi:10.1145/2693839.2686759
Hattie, J. (2013). Calibration and confidence: Where to next? Learning and Instruction, 24,
Lee, T.H., Shen, P.D., Tsai, C.W. (2010). Enhance students’ computing skills via web-mediated self-regulated learning with feedback in blended environment. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction 6(1), 15—32.
Moore, M. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22—38). New York: Routledge.
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
Orhan, F. (2007). Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a blended learning instruction. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2(4), 390—398.
Picciano, A.G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40.
Picciano, A. G. & Seaman, J. (2009). K-12 online learning: A 2008 follow-up of the survey of U.S. school district administrators. NY: The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/k-12online2008.
Picciano, A.G. & Seaman, J. (2010). Class connections: High school reform and the role of online learning. Boston, MA: Babson College Survey Research Group.
Pintrich, P., & Garcia, T. (1994). Self-regulated learning in college students: Knowledge, strategies, and motivation. In P. R. Pintrich, D. Brown, and C. Weinstein (Eds.), Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pintrich, P., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R.
Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631—649). San Diego: Academic Press.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(1), 1721-1731.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education (2011). Just Write! Guide. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education.
Weimer, M. (2009) What it means to be a self-regulated learner. The Teaching Professor.
Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. 4th ed., London: Sage.
Zimmerman, B. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview.
Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.
Zimmerman, B. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
Zimmerman, B. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.