Virtual School Meanderings

March 20, 2012

More Misinformation From The Right

Yesterday I began the week with an entry on the rhetorical question of Why Do Cyber Charter Proponents Lie? (although one person did feel the need to answer).  Later in the day, these two items came across my electronic desk…

Part one is all about higher education, but in part two the author goes into the realm of K-12 online learning; and lo and behold, we find:

Online education also is making its presence increasingly felt at the K–12 level, leading education analysts Clayton Christensen and Michael Horn to predict that by 2019, 50 percent of all courses for grades 9–12 will be taken online — “the vast majority of them in blended-learning school environments with teachers, which will fundamentally move learning beyond the four walls and traditional arrangement of today’s all-too-familiar classroom.”

If their forecast proves even half-right, it is reasonable to expect that, in very short order, waves of online-educated, college-bound students will be comfortable with, will expect, and perhaps — given both its lower cost and instructional efficacy — will demand a similar mix of face-to-face and online education.  (emphasis added)

Again I am forced to ask, what instructional efficacy and where is the actual evidence for this?  None is presented, I suspect because none can be found.

In fact, if you look at the evidence this author uses in general, it is a mismash of misunderstanding and ideologically driven, unreviewed items.  In part one the author – look so many others on the right – misuses the US Department of Education meta-analysis (see Why Do Cyber Charter Proponents Lie? for why this is a misuse), cites an opinion report from a right-wing think tank focused on privatization of public services and the extreme right-wing book authors Moe and Chubb, moves on to the opinion-based survey conducted by the Pew Research Center, and finishes with the descriptive survey conducted by the Babson Survey Research Group.  In part two, the author begins with the Christensen and Horn predictions (which those of us who have been involved in K-12 online learning have refuted – see  Lost in Cyberspace and Theory of Disruption Applied to K-12 Doesn’t Compute), more from the descriptive Babson Survey Research Group’s work, thoughts from Allan Bloom and Aristotle (both of whom would have been steeped in online learning having died in 1992 and 322BC respective), and that’s it!

Where is the methodologically valid and reliable evidence to support the use of online learning – at any level?  Where is the peer reviewed research to further the discussion of this important topic?  In both instances it is no where to be found!  But these are the tactics of the right, cite like-minded ideologues and misuse research that may present their position in a favourable light in an attempt to put one over on society.  I do hope my American colleagues have the good sense to see through it, as their legislators – at least for the moment – are too busy being swindled to figure this out!


  1. Reblogged this on emmageraln.

    Comment by emmageraln — March 20, 2012 @ 10:02 am | Reply

  2. […] } #themeHeader #titleAndDescription * { color: black; } – Today, 12:02 […]

    Pingback by More Misinformation From The Right | E-Learning and Online Teaching | — March 20, 2012 @ 1:03 pm | Reply

  3. I’ve scooped this and bounced it around the Internet via my E-Learning and Online Teaching Digital Magazine:

    Michael, keep asking the tough questions. I learn so much from you because you challenge assumptions. Great work buddy!

    Dennis O’Connor
    UW-Stout E-Learning

    Comment by zipquestr — March 20, 2012 @ 1:05 pm | Reply

    • Thanks Dennis… Although it doesn’t seem to be doing much good if you look at the legislative changes happening throughout the United States.

      Comment by mkbnl — March 20, 2012 @ 1:20 pm | Reply

      • All we can do is explain clearly and stay focused. The future of the technology is bright. The costs are coming down. The disruption is long overdue. Mis-information crumbles in the face of solid critical thinking.

        That’s why we teach, right?

        ~ Dennis

        Comment by zipquestr — March 21, 2012 @ 11:28 am

      • Very true Dennis… But if we end up with a regulatory regime that promotes practices that run counter to this solid thinking, it doesn’t really matter in the end… Does it?

        Comment by mkbnl — March 21, 2012 @ 12:30 pm

  4. […] background-position: 50% 0px; background-color:#222222; background-repeat : no-repeat; } – Today, 8:41 […]

    Pingback by More Misinformation From The Right | Using Technology to Enhance Learning | — March 22, 2012 @ 9:41 pm | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: