Virtual High School Meanderings

November 6, 2008

A Message to VSS 2008 Presenters

A message that we got from iNACOL for people who presented at this past Virtual School Symposium in Phoenix.

Dear VSS 2008 Presenters -

Thank you, again, for all of your time and effort at this year’s Virtual School Symposium. It was an incredibly valuable time spent teaching, learning and collaborating.

Please, if you haven’t done so already, visit the wiki and upload your power point presentations: http://vss2008.wikispaces.com/. Here are some basic instructions, if needed:

If you are uploading a file, you will have to create a free account with Wikispaces and request to join the vss2008 wiki. Once you have done this, simply go to the page with your session listed and edit it. To upload a file, you will need to click the button at the top that looks like a picture of a tree, upload the image and/or file and then double click on it and it will be embedded into the page.

Please feel free to add any information to your page to enrich the resource.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,
Wendy C. Fleming
Associate Director of Communications
International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL)
1934 Old Gallows Road, Suite 350, Vienna, VA 22182
Office 703-752-6216
Fax 703-752-6201

Save the Date!
2009 Virtual School Symposium
November 15 – 17, 2009 in Austin, TX
www.virtualschoolsymposium.org

www.inacol.org

To add a little bit…  If you need a guide on how to create an account with Wikispaces, watch Get Going With Wikispaces for the first minute.  Also, if you need help in figuring out how to edit a page, watch Wikispaces Editing.  Finally, if you need help adding a file (such as your PowerPoint), watch Inserting A File On Wikispaces.

November 4, 2008

Virtual School Symposium (VSS) 2008 Wrap-Up

This showed up in my inbox earlier this morning.

Dear NACOL Members and VSS attendees:

Attendance Grows — Thank you to the NACOL members and our new attendees at VSS 2008 last week. VSS attendance was excellent – breaking all previous records with 1199 attendees.

Going International — The big announcement was made on October 26 that NACOL is expanding our reach and becoming iNACOL, the International Association for K-12 Online Learning.

NACOL in the News — The Virtual School Symposium made the news across Arizona:

VSS Website — The VSS Overlay is a new website where you can view select presentations and access VSS-related materials.

CDE Online State Survey of Policies — NACOL is pleased to announce that the Center for Digital Education (CDE) released a ranking of al 50 state policies supporting online learning in the Online Learning Policy and Practice Survey: A Survey of the States. This report was developed in partnership with the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) and the North American Council for Online Learning (NACOL).

Thank you for your time and excellent efforts in making VSS a success. Seeing all of the experts and leaders in the field come together to make a difference for the kids – and network and collaborate – is incredibly rewarding for me. I am grateful to all of your work in opening opportunities through K-12 online education and helping the kids across the country and across the globe.

Sincerely,

Susan Patrick

President & CEO, iNACOL

November 3, 2008

VSS 2008 Report: Blogging About VSS

Okay, I know I posted the VSS 2008 Report: VSS Overlay [ADD LINK] earlier today, which listed off the number of folks who were blogging and provided links to their blogs.  Here are the actual entries about VSS 2008 that I was able to find (note that the ones I posted are not included, but can be viewed at VSS 2008):

California Dreamin’ by Rob Darrow

Clayton Christensen

Hintonblog

iterating toward openness

My State of Flux

Teaching and Developing Online.

Things from my mind…

In addition to these bloggers, there were a cohort of microbloggers (actually many of the same people) who included (all Twitter folks because that is the one we pushed):

And that’s all I knew about.  If you were blogging or mircoblogging at the Virtual School Symposium this past month and I have missed you, please let me know.

VSS 2008 Report: VSS Overlay

For those not familiar with what the VSS Overlay was, read the second half of the entry on New Initiatives at the Virtual School Symposium.

In terms of usage, let me discuss each of the parts of the Overlay.

VSS Wiki

By far the most used aspect of the VSS Overlay.  The wiki was made available to presenters on 21 October and made public via this blog and the Virtual School Symposium website on 23 October.  To give you a sense of the amount of use, here are the edits made since that day:

  • 20081021 – 829
  • 20081022 – 51
  • 20081023 – 446
  • 20081024 – 281
  • 20081025 – 120
  • 20081026 – 1281
  • 20081027 – 2854
  • 20081028 – 2826
  • 20081029 – 1694
  • 20081030 – 948
  • 20081031 – 426
  • 20081101 – 0
  • 20081102 – 4
  • 20081103 – 8

And here are the number of hits (and individual users) to the wiki during the same period:

  • 20081021 – 829 (6)
  • 20081022 – 51 (8)
  • 20081023 – 446 (70)
  • 20081024 – 281 (45)
  • 20081025 – 120 (33)
  • 20081026 – 1281 (67)
  • 20081027 – 2854 (154)
  • 20081028 – 2826 (138)
  • 20081029 – 1694 (120)
  • 20081030 – 948 (103)
  • 20081031 – 426 (60)
  • 20081101 – 285 (47)
  • 20081102 – 248 (29)

By far, this was the most used aspect of the VSS Overlay.  Both presenters and attendees seemed to use it.  Presenters posted PPT slides and other resources.  Attendees used to to add their own notes for the session.  There were even six discussion messages posted to various parts of the wiki.

And it wasn’t just a folks in Phoenix thing using this resources.  If you look at the country codes where the ISPs were registered, you would see:

  • United States – 81.2618%
  • Canada – 17.9328%
  • Unknown – 0.3649%
  • Netherlands – 0.1468%
  • New Zealand – 0.1091%
  • Saudi Arabia – 0.0629%
  • Mexico – 0.021%
  • United Kingdom – 0.021%
  • Australia – 0.021%
  • Qatar – 0.0168%
  • Philippines – 0.0168%
  • Turkey – 0.0126%
  • Singapore – 0.0084%
  • Republic of Korea – 0.0042%

Given that everyone using the wiki during the conference would have showed up under a US-based ISP, the international usage indicates either presenters and attendees using the wiki before their went to VSS or after they returned home, or people who never actually came to Phoenix for VSS and accessed it from home.

Live Presentations

This was a mixed bag in terms of success (and maybe how you actually measure success).  According to the Live Presentations Online there were eleven sessions that were broadcast using Elluminate by Elluminate, Inc. and one session broadcast via Elluminate by Rob Darrow.  Personally, I logged into three or four of the Elluminate ones provided by Elluminate (all ones broadcast from the main ballroom) and while there were usually four or five people there not in Phoenix and another three or four there from Phoenix, these sessions were typically not well received.  There were complaints about the audio quality and even more complaints about the PPT slides (as several of the presenters had multiple layers and animation in their slides that get condensed into a single – often unreadable – image in the Elluminate rooms).  In at least two of the sessions I was in, people left quite early in the presentations because of this frustration.

The Live Presentations Online page also listed eight presentations that were going to be broadcast via UStream.  I know that one of those eight wasn’t broadcast for sure, but those presenters did broadcast a later presentation that simply wasn’t linked into the page.  Of the remaining seven listed on the page, I know that five were definitely broadcast as the recordings are available.  The other two may have also been broadcast, but recordings were not made so I can’t say for sure. I know this is a lot of textual information, so here is what I can report in point form:

  • 8 Ustream presentations listed – 7 went ahead, 1 didn’t, 1 presentation not listed was Ustreamed
  • of these 8 presentation that were UStreamed , 6 were recorded

Personally, I was responsible for three of the eight presentations listed.  I was able to monitor two of those three (as for the K-12 Online Learning in Canada presentation I was the only presenter so I wasn’t able to check the chat room to see if there were attendees – so if you watched the broadcast via UStream please let me know).  In the two that I monitored, one had a single participate from Northern Ontario that wasn’t able to join us in Phoenix and the other one did not have anyone watching.  Although I note that the recordings for all three have been viewed – as have the recordings for the other three presentations that were broadcast and recorded.

The third form of live presentation that we listed at the Live Presentations Online page was the CoverItLive blogging.  Only two presenters signed up to do this and neither followed through and actually did it.  The page originally listed a total of nine sessions that were going to be covered – as I enlisted the help of a colleague of mine here in Michigan, Jay Bennett, to do six and I did three of my own.  I note on the page now there was a tenth one added by Brett Hinton. In addition, I have since discovered that Tim Holt used CoverItLive to blog about a total of nine sessions, none of which are included in the Live Presentations Online page.  I don’t know if Brett or Tim had any participants in their sessions.  I know in the three that I completed I had one person monitoring one of my CoverItLive sessions – although they didn’t say anything so I’m not sure if they were actually there or not.  I can say that at least 18 of these 19 CoverItLive transcripts have been posted to the individual’s respective blogs (see the next entry for a list of people’s blog and VSS 2008 entries).

Blogging

This is another one that I’m struggling with, in terms of how it went.  The VSS Overlay instructions asked:

However, Technorati isn’t the most reliable of services.  I know personally I have set-up my blog to communication with Technorati and use tags in every single one of my posts.  I have an account with Technorati, I have claimed this blog and regularly login to Technorati to make sure it is pinging this blog.  Unfortunately, not a single one of my entries since I migrated from Blogger has shown up in Technorati.  And a current search of Technorati on NACOL and VSS 2008 reveals no entries.

Having said that, based upon bloggers I personally follow or found during VSS this year, I know that there were at least seven different bloggers active during the VSS conference.  Those seven bloggers posted a total of nineteen different entries (see the next entry for a list of people’s blog and VSS 2008 entries).  There may have been more, but I have no way of knowing.

Microblogging

The final aspect of the VSS Overlay was microblogging, where attendees were asked:

  • real-time feedback using Twitter – please use the hashtag #vss2008 in each of your tweets

There was a problem with this and the problem was with my instructions (due to my lack of knowledge at the time of hashtags).  Apparently, in order for hashtags to be indexed a Twitter user has to be following the hashtags bot – essentially a computer program that indexes Twitter entries that used #sometexthere.  I didn’t know this until after the conference, so I didn’t tell people about it until after the conference, and the seven people using Twitter at the conference (five of whom were using the hastag #vss2008) obviously didn’t know either because there is no #vss2008 listed at http://hashtags.org/alltags/V/.

Having said that, I know that I did add eleven new people that I began following while I was in Phoenix attending the Virtual School Symposium.  Three of those eleven were using the hashtag and were people I have never met or connected with online before.  I can also say that there were at least three people in my network that weren’t in Phoenix that interacted with things I was posting about various sessions on my Twitter account.  So, in a very limited way it didn’t extend the conference beyond Phoenix for those individuals.

Overall Assessment

In the end, the item that I spent the most time working on to set-up (i.e., the wiki) was by far the most used and most commented on portion of the VSS Overlay.  While the live presentations feature did not really get much use during the actual conference, they have provided a useful recordings (both text-based via CoverItLive and video ones from UStream) for people to be able to access the content of the sessions after the fact.  Unfortunately Technorati is not a reliable way to integrate bloggers (and even more unfortunate is the fact that there simply isn’t anything else out there worth using to replace it).  Finally, with more Twitter users and accurate instructions for hashtag use, this could be quite useful for both interaction and connections within individual’s own networks.

For the of you who were in Phoenix and made use of any of these tools, if you have anything you’d like to add from the user side of things I’d welcome your thoughts.

For those of you who were not in Phoenix and made use of any of these tools, if you have anything you’d like to add to feel free to post it as a comment to this entry.

Finally, for those who didn’t use these tools (regardless if you were in Phoenix or not), I’d welcome your feedback as well.

VSS 2008 Report: Chat With A Researcher

So, this is something I’ll discuss a bit at our next meeting of iNACOL’s research committee, but I figured that today would be my VSS 2008 reporting day, so here it is…

In case you aren’t familiar with the “Chat with a Researcher”, see the first half of the entry on New Initiatives at the Virtual School Symposium.

Anyway, we had six members of the research committee volunteer to meet with anyone interested in chatting about research while at the Virtual School Symposium.  Before I continue, let me thank those individuals for giving up some of their time at the conference.  VSS is a great networking opportunity for us in the research committee, and I know from personal experience that time away from that networking often results in fewer research/evaluation leads and partnerships – so I sincerely thank each of them for their time.  Anyway, five of these individuals had two specific times listed, and one had two slots listed and his cell phone number (as his schedule was kind of hectic and changing).  In total, there were six Monday slots available, three Tuesday slots available, and then these two untimed slots.

In total we had nine individuals sign-up (some multiple times).  The sign-up looked kind of like this:

Researcher

Slot 1

Slot 2

#1 Monday, 9:30-10:00
JP
Monday, 5:15-5:45
RB
TF
#2 Monday, 12:30-1:00
-

Monday, 1:00-1:30
-

#3 Monday, 9:30-10:00
KK
DC
Tuesday, 10:30-11:00
RB
#4 Monday, 1:00-1:45
RB
JP
SL
Tuesday, 10:15-11:00
DD
#5 Tuesday, 10:15-11:00
-
Tuesday, 1:15-1:45
AG
#6 Unscheduled
MC
Unscheduled
-

Just based on the completed forms, of the nine individuals who signed up one of them signed up to meet with three researchers, one signed up to meet with two researchers, and the remaining seven only signed up once.  This meant that there were a total of twelve meetings scheduled, in eight of the twelve slots.

In following up with each of the six researchers who volunteered I discovered that there were three meetings that didn’t happen (noted in italics above).  In one case the person who signed up was late showing up and the researcher #3 and the other person who signed up had already moved to a quieter location.  In the other cases, researcher #1 checked during the day and no one was signed up, but apparently the researcher had checked two people did sign up (she was able to get a hold of one using the e-mail addresses NACOL had on file, but one of the e-mail addresses wasn’t a valid one).

Something else which happened, as you can see above was that more than a single person signed up in a single slot.  While there were no instructions saying that you could or couldn’t, the intention was one person per slot.  Researcher #4, who had three people in one session, indicated “No one said anything, but I think the three would have preferred their own time rather than sharing. We might want a minimum of 20 min per person.”  So I guess we have to either shorten times or make the instructions clearer next year.

There was one other area of confusion that did arise.  One researcher noted that, the person who signed up to meet with them “seemed at first to think that I was looking for graduate students, instead of just offering some time to talk with any who wanted to meet.”  Again I guess that speaks to the nature of the instructions.

Finally, one thing that I personally noticed about the sign-up sheets.  Each sheet contained the sign-up information for two members of the research committee.  In the instructions, all individuals were identified as members of the research committee.  In the individual sign-up areas, we included the researcher’s name, the organization they belonged to, and the space to sign up.  The three members of the research committee coming from universities all had both of the slots booked.  The two members of the research committee coming from research labs or evaluation companies had one of their two slots booked.  The member of the research committee who came from a virtual school had no one sign up.  I’m not sure why this was.  I might speculate that while all six were members of the research committee, the five that had people sign up to meet with them have all published in the field of K-12 online learning.  Given that most, if not all of the people who signed up were graduate students there may have been some name recognition based on the literature that played a role.

As I mentioned in my entry on New Initiatives at the Virtual School Symposium, I was late getting this initiative started this year due to the VSS Overlay.  I think if I had begun work on it earlier I could have submitted a paragraph that could have been included in the program booklet and on the VSS website.  This would have helped with both the instructions and the confusion that did arise.

Another thing that we have been tossing around since we first tried this in 2007 is the idea of having the ability to indicate that you would like to speak with a researcher or evaluator built in to the web-based registration form in the future. There are a couple of ways this could be done.  Attendees could indicate if they are interested in meeting with a researcher or evaluator or indicate that it doesn’t matter.  There could also be an open field where they could also name a specific individual if they there was someone specific they wanted to talk to.  There could be a way to indicate specific times, blocks of times or days – or we could exclude that and simply try and connect member of the research committee and attendee via e-mail to schedule a specific time between the two of them.

If we didn’t or couldn’t use the registration form as a way to identify folks, we could simply identify one or more of the longer (i.e., those 45 minute) breaks where members of the research committee would be available in a specific room for consultations.  Although I personally think the identification on the registration form is a better way to go.

For those who volunteered, again thank you.  If you have anything you’d like to add to this, feel free to post it as a comment to this entry.

For the nine individuals who signed up to take advantage of this opportunity, if you have anything you’d like to add from the user side of things, I’d welcome that as well.

Finally, for those who didn’t sign up and for those who were in Phoenix and didn’t even know about this, I’d welcome your feedback as well.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.