A couple of items that were posted in the NACOL forums related to the issue of online science labs. The first:
The National Science Teachers Association, a 55,000 member organization and arguably the most qualified authority to weigh in, has made a clear stance in the debate of hands on vs. virtual labs.
http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/laboratory.aspx
They do however also laud the use of computers in scientific inquiry, with the following caveat:
“Lest the following emphasis on computers be misunderstood, we assert at the outset that computers should enhance, but not replace essential “hands on” laboratory activities. “
http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/computers.aspx
eScience labs inc., ( www.esciencelabs.com ) shares this position and uniquely provides a blended approach combining the best hands-on activities coupled by supplemental online learning tools.
And a response was also posted, that read in part:
Please, a point of clarification . . . The NSTA policy statement on laboratories that was approved in 2007 does not use the words “hands on” - so we can’t jump to that conclusion or make that differentiation when it is not indicated in that statement of policy.
In fact, I’m on a committee on e-learning for NSTA and they have approved a new 2008 policy statement advocating specifically in support of e-learning and science education that has not been posted yet to their website. It does support the use of online learning for science education and does not include a reference to “hand on” laboratories, but references the NACOL paper on Scientific Investigations — emphasizing quality investigations and scientific inquiry in online education for K-12 grade levels.
It appears that this continues to be an issue that K-12 online learning programs are wrestling with.