Virtual High School Meanderings

November 24, 2009

Seeking Non-US K-12 Online Teacher Blogger

inacolThis was posted to the iNACOL forums earlier today…

Hi, we are seeking a K12 online teacher outside of the U.S. to be a founding contributor to our new blog on the same topic. No compensation involved, but you have the opportunity to inform thousands of others in the field. Requirements, minimum of 1 blog post per month, 2-3 paragraphs.

Email Lisa Dawley lisadawley-at-boisestate-dot-edu, include link to your current blog, if available.

Thank you!

——————–
Lisa Dawley, Ph.D.
Professor & Chair
Dept. of Educational Technology
Boise State University
lisadawley-at-boisestate-dot-edu

Darren, may be something of interest for you or one of your teachers?

Blogging About The Virtual School Symposium

November 22, 2009

Moving Away From Carnegie Units Toward Competency-Based Learning: Need Feedback And Examples

inacolThis showed up in my inbox yesterday.  If you have feedback or examples for Susan or Wendy, please e-mail them directly.

Dear iNACOL Members:

Please, we would like your help and feedback. I just received an email from a senior staff person in the federal government with questions on the issue of moving away from seat-time and Carnegie units toward competency-based learning models.

The iNACOL membership has the opportunity to provide guidance for policies to modernize our K-12 education system away from Carnegie units of seat-time toward competency-based systems with both the federal government leadership and state leadership.

We would like to hear from you: what kind of changes should be made in these laws or policies? What are best practices and models? How can it be done within state departments of education? How does competency-based learning work with regional accreditation agencies to reach an agreement? Has your state or program has worked on issues to change (or has changed) seat time policies?

Your input and responses are important. Please, if you have feedback on moving from seat-time to competency-based learning – let us know. If you can refer experts in this area, we appreciate it. Please email Susan Patrick, spatrick-at-inacol-dot-org and copy Wendy Fleming, wfleming-at-inacol-dot-org with information. This is a short-turn around… please reply by November 24th.

Thank you again for all of your support in moving the field K-12 online learning forward and helping the kids.

Sincerely,
Susan Patrick
President & CEO
International Association for K-12 Online Learning
1934 Old Gallows Road, Suite 350
Vienna, VA 22182
phone (703) 752-6216
fax (703) 752-6201
www.inacol.org

P.S. Thank you again to everyone for making VSS 2009 a success! We had 1,626 registered attendees for VSS. From the event, we have received a lot of feedback and new ideas and directions to take K-12 online learning to the next level.

November 17, 2009

VSS 2009 – An International Perspective of K-12 Online Learning [OR] The Release Of The 2009 iNACOL Canada Report

vss_2009_headerWell, I just finished with the An International Perspective of K-12 Online Learning panel at the Virtual School Symposium .  I was able to join this panel through the VSS Overlay’s Live Presentations feature. My role on this panel was related to the iNACOL Canada report that was officially released today.  As the press release states:

iNACOL Releases New Report, State of the Nation: K-12 Online Learning in Canada

AUSTIN, TX, November 17, 2009 – The International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL) released State of the Nation Study: K-12 Online Learning in Canada at the annual Virtual School Symposium today.

The goal of the report is to examine the K-12 distance education policies and activities in each of the Canadian provinces and territories. This was done by examining the legislation and regulations that govern K-12 distance education in each jurisdiction and describing the programs that provide online learning opportunities.

According to Susan Patrick, iNACOL President and CEO, “For more than a decade, Canadian governments have focused on the expansion of K-12 online learning to serve students in remote areas and provide new educational opportunities that engage students. The report provides a rich illustration of how Canada is poised to provide every student, regardless of their geography, with access to high-quality online learning opportunities.”

Michael Barbour, the author of the study, said, “In this year’s study, we tried to provide vignettes to helps readers get a better sense of the many variations in online learning in Canada; they serve to personalize the students, teachers, schools and programs.”

K-12 online learning is growing at an estimated annual pace of 30% annually. Online learning benefits include expanding opportunity to high-quality instructors and courses, leveling the playing field for all students to access a high-quality education and transforming the learning experience with a customized and individualized instructional model.

The report was sponsored by and funded by Connections Academy. It is available online at: http://www.inacol.org/research/reports.php.

The actual report can be viewed at http://www.inacol.org/research/docs/iNACOL_CanadaStudy_200911.pdf and I would like to thank Connections Academy as this year’s sponsor, iNACOL for their continued publication of this project, and all of those who provided information contained in the report.

VSS 2009 – Liberating Learning: Technology, Politics, And The Future of American Education

vss_2009_headerOkay, we are on the second and final day for the Virtual School Symposium and I am continuing to use the VSS Overlay’s Live Presentations feature to sit in on some of the sessions so I can blog about them.  The first one today is the morning keynote, which was delivered by Terry Moe on his book, Liberating Learning: Technology, Politics, and the Future of American Education.

I should admit up front that I haven’t had a chance to read this book yet.  I purchased it, or maybe someone sent it to me (as I have gotten several books that have been addressed to Michael K. Barbour / Virtual High School Meanderings / Blogger, Educator, Teacher – which I’ve always found interesting), but I didn’t get around to reading it.  Based on reading what folks I respect in the blogsphere had to say about the book, it seemed like another book written by a non-educator that those pushing a certain agenda of school choice and the dismantling of the current public education system would love – but those of us involved in education would find so many holes in it that you could drive a mac truck through them (somewhat like the issues I had with Disrupting Class). Anyway, so I haven’t read the book.

In terms of the actual session, we missed the first half of the keynote – as there were audio problems with the Elluminate feed.  Another issue with the Elluminate feed

As best I can tell, he spent the first 15 minutes or so looking at the benefits of K-12 online learning and why the field has seen exponential growth over the past decade.  He then began to discuss the state-wide program models, focusing specifically on the State of Florida and the Florida Virtual School.  Then moved to the full-time programs operated under the auspices of cyber charter schools, focusing on the Pennsylvania Cyber Charter School which when it opened expected 50 students, enrolled 500 students, and not have 8000 students.  Finally, he discussed hybrid schools – schools that students physically attend, but much of the curriculum is offered online.  He used a charter school in San Jose called Rocketship as an example.  He called this the bright side of the story.

He then transitioned to the dark side of the story, and took the typical conservative viewpoint that public education, teachers, unions, etc. have vested political and economic interests in maintaining the status quo.  The first one that is took a swing at was the teachers’ unions – which again is a favourite target of the conservative movement.  And like any good conservative, he goes back to the flawed and inflammatory A Nation at Risk and talked about the reformers and the school choice movement (all of the “good guys”).  If you weren’t in Austin or didn’t join in to the live feed, you didn’t miss anything.  From what I can tell the first bit of the keynote was providing examples of what everyone in the room knew, and then spent about half of the time bashing all of the favourite right-wing targets.

In terms of looking ahead, Moe saw technology and online learning as having potential to actually make reforms to the system because:

  1. decreases the number of teachers needed, which means fewer members in the teachers’ unions
  2. not geographic dependent, which makes it more difficult for the unions to organize
  3. the growth of cyber charters, most of which aren’t unionized (again meaning fewer members)
  4. the collection of student data in online learning, which allows for an easy comparison of how these schools perform compared to underperforming brick-and-mortar schools

Interesting how the potential for online learning in society is directly tied to the decrease in the power of the unions.  What an American-centric view!!!  I wonder if he’s ever bothered to look at other jurisdictions where K-12 online learning is growing and thriving, and it is being done in conjunction with the teachers’ unions (hint, try looking north)???  Doesn’t this keynote sum up the main problem with American education?  People are more interested in politicizing education into issues of right and left, and trying to position the left as the problem and the right as the solution.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.