Virtual School Meanderings

May 10, 2014

Scale Online and Blended Learning through 13 Automated Processes

Also from Thursday’s inbox…


Faster, Smarter: Operating Efficient, Successful Online and Blended Learning Programs

Join Us for a Webinar
Tuesday, May 13
2:00 PM EDT

Learn how Tres Tyvand and the Bend La Pine School District in Oregon has leveraged automated engagement tools in their online learning programs, for enrollment and on-boarding students to provide weekly academic progress reports to students, teachers and administrators. In additional to saving thousands of dollars on administrative costs, they have automated more than 13 different processes – making each more timely and accurate, and improving the student, teacher and administrator experience. 

Topics will include:
  • How to create programs to personalize learning for students and customize their experience
  • How to create and grow online and blended learning programs without hiring more staff
  • Tactics for creating engagement among administrators, teachers and students
  • Steps to automate processes, freeing up time to focus on student success

Register Now


Tres Tyvand, Bend-La Pine School District

Tres Tyvand
Program Coordinator
Bend-La Pine School District. OR

Matthew Camacho, Fuel Education

Matthew Camacho, 
Sr. Manager of Product Management
Fuel Education
2300 CORPORATE PARK DRIVE, HERNDON, VA 20171| 866.912.8588 |
Copyright © 2014, Fuel Education LLC. All rights reserved. Third-party trademarks referenced herein are property of those respective parties.

May 5, 2014

K12 Inc. Releases 24 New AP® Exam Prep Apps For Mobile Devices

Some weeks ago, K12, Inc. announced K12 Inc. Releases 24 New AP® Exam Prep Apps for Mobile DevicesEssentially, they had produced the following apps:

  • AP Exam Prep Biology
  • AP Exam Prep Calculus AB
  • AP Exam Prep Calculus BC
  • AP Exam Prep English Language and Composition
  • AP Exam Prep English Literature and Composition
  • AP Exam Prep Environmental Science
  • AP Exam Prep European History
  • AP Exam Prep Psychology
  • AP Exam Prep Statistics
  • AP Exam Prep U.S. Government and Politics
  • AP Exam Prep U.S. History
  • AP Exam Prep World History

They have a good commercial on YouTube that tours the AP Exam Prep World History.

They described that:

“Full-function “Lite” versions of all 12 AP Exam Prep apps can be downloaded for free from iTunes, GooglePlay and the Amazon AppStore.  A one-time in-app purchase of $9.99 – 11.99 will unlock the full content. Teachers and administrators can also take advantage of the 50% discount available for schools through the Apple Volume Purchase Program, where a paid “Full” version of the app is available.”

I’ve downloaded all of the lite versions, but haven’t had much of a chance to play around yet.  If it is anything like their other apps, and I suspect that it is, you can get a sense of the style of these apps from my Review of iPhone App – Algebra I Study Review (which I downloaded when it was free for one weekend).

May 1, 2014

LRN: K12′s CEO Discusses F3Q 2014 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

From Tuesday’s inbox…

K12′s CEO Discusses F3Q 2014 Results – Earnings Call Transcript by SA Transcripts
This article was published on Tue, Apr. 29, 2:44 PM ET

Read the full article now »

Sent by Seeking Alpha, 345 7th Ave. Suite 1400 New York, NY 10001

April 30, 2014

Breaking: LRN Earnings

This came through yesterday morning – note still no Yahoo stock alerts (I may have to switch to Google).

K12 beats by $0.02, beats on revenue • 6:37 AM

  • K12 (LRN): FQ3 EPS of $0.40 beats by $0.02.
  • Revenue of $235.2M (+7.9% Y/Y) beats by $2.8M.
  • Press Release

Read comments

LRN price at time of publication: $21.40. Check LRN price now »

Was this email forwarded to you? Learn more about Seeking Alpha Alerts here »

Focus Articles on LRN

More News on LRN

Press Releases on LRN

Related Articles on LRN

StockTalk on LRN: LRN StockTalk | Twitter LRN | Twitter $LRN | LRN Instablogs

Recent Market Alerts on LRN: All news | Earnings | Dividends | M&A | On the move

Transcripts on LRN

Sent by Seeking Alpha, 345 7th Ave. Suite 1400 New York, NY 10001

NCAA And K-12 Online Learning

Last week I mentioned about the NCAA’s decision concerning the acceptance of courses from a number of K12, Inc. schools.

As I mentioned in that earlier entry, K12, Inc. has responded.

It is interesting to review the range of responses.  As I mentioned in my initial response, I doesn’t disagree with this decision.  I have often been supportive of the moves that the NCAA has made when it comes to online learning.  For example, this isn’t the first time that the NCAA has found K12, Inc. programs to be of questionable quality (see K12 Inc.: The Skirmish In Seminole County And The Desperate Race and NCAA Calls Into Question the Quality Of Two Online Learning Programs).

And contrary to what K12, Inc. officials will say the guidelines are fairly transparent – and sensible based on what we know about K-12 online learning.  For example, in the NCAA guidelines (based on proposal 2009-64) they indicate:

Courses taught via the Internet, distance learning, independent study, individualized instruction, correspondence, and courses taught by similar means may be used to satisfy NCAA core-course requirements if all of the following conditions are satisfied:
(a) The course meets all requirements for a core course as defined in Bylaw;
(b) The instructor and the student have ongoing access to one another for purposes of teaching, evaluating and providing assistance to the student throughout the duration of the course;
(c) The instructor and the student have regular interaction with one another for purposes of teaching, evaluating and providing assistance to the student throughout the duration of the course;
(d) The student’s work (e.g., exams, papers, assignments) is available for evaluation and validation;
(e) Evaluation of the student’s work is conducted by the appropriate academic authorities in accordance with the high school’s established academic policies;
(f) The course includes a defined time period for completion; and
(g) The course is acceptable for any student and is placed on the high school transcript.

Anyone see anything particularly wrong with these requirements?  From my perspective, I believe you’re right to call into question the quality of K-12 online learning that doesn’t meet these requirements.

« Previous PageNext Page »

The Rubric Theme. Blog at


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,458 other followers