I was reading through all of the news items that the administration of NACOL have been posting in their forums last night, and I came across an interesting reply to one of them from a NACOL member. This member wrote:
Thanks for the post. What I would like to see, now, is the response which NACOL is going to file with both the newspaper and the government of WI NACOL has all the statistics and back up information to support the virtual schools in WI. Alert via the list is important, but the organizational muscle is what is needed at this moment.
This got me thinking and wondering the same thing, what is NACOL’s position. The mission of the organization reads:
The mission of the North American Council for Online Learning (NACOL) is to increase educational opportunities and enhance learning by providing collegial expertise and leadership in K-12 online teaching and learning.
Would this not be a situation where “expertise and leadership” could be provided “to increase educational opportunities” of students in Wisconsin through “K-12 online teaching and learning”.
Anyway, my response to this individual in the forum read:
I’m less concerned with NACOL response to the newspaper, what I’d like to see is NACOL’s brief to the legislators on how they think the legislation should be re-written to allow for a logical solution. To date, the solutions that I’ve seen put forward that “save Wisconsin cyber charters” are largely spinless attempts to pander to those parents who have their children enrolled in these schools.
The court case in question raised legitimate questions, how much can a public school (and charters are public schools too) expect and/or demand of a parent in terms of instructional responsibilities? I wonder what parents would say if a traditional public school expected them to maintain the majority of the instructional burden? This is a legitimate issue that needs to be address with more than a piece of legislation that says that a teacher should be consider the person who assigns the grade, regardless of how much work the parent is REQUIRED to do by the school. That is simply skirting their responsibility as legislators!!!
The teaching issue is just one, another legitimate one is the geographic location issue - both in terms of where a student residents and where a school is located. A third the funding that follows a student when the online teacher and school clearly do a different (and many, including myself, would argue an easier) job than the brick-and-mortar teacher and school.
These are issues that need to be considered and resolved, not just ignored. And I’d be interested in seeing NACOL’s position on the appeals court decision and how the legislative issues should be addressed.
I wonder if NACOL would post their legislative brief or their letters that they wrote to the various legislators and governor in their lobbying effort?

